MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90263-c

Медицинская библиотека · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 1992

Plague in Lushoto district, Tanzania, 1980-1988.

Kilonzo B S, Mbise T J, Makundi R H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Rodents were live-trapped in selected plague-inflicted villages from June 1980 to March 1988. Flea infestation rates were determined and the animals were serologically tested for plague. Clinically suspected and clinically healthy people in the affected areas were similarly tested for plague antibodies. Of 1596 rodent sera tested, 91 (5.7%) were positive for plague. These were mostly from Rattus rattus, Mastomys natalensis, Otomys spp. and Pelomys fallax. A total of 1772 fleas, of which Dinopsyllus lypusus, Xenopsylla brasiliensis and Ctenophthalmus calceatus comprised the largest proportion, was collected from the captured rodents. Total flea indices ranged from 0.67 to 1.12 fleas per rodent. A total of 2809 human cases and a mortality rate of 10.2% were recorded in 1980-1988. It was concluded that most rodent species in the area were suitable reservoirs of plague and that D. lypusus, X. brasiliensis and C. calceatus were probably responsible for transmitting the pathogen. Lack of effective quarantine measures during outbreaks was partly responsible for the spread of the disease to many villages, while inadequate rodent and flea control and poor sanitary measures could be responsible for continued outbreaks of plague in the area.

Для цитирования: Kilonzo B S, Mbise T J, Makundi R H. Plague in Lushoto district, Tanzania, 1980-1988.. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90263-c.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.