MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory care · 1992

Computers in the ICU: panacea or plague?

East T D

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The introduction of the intensive care unit (ICU) in the 1960s with its demands for management of large volumes of patient data drove the initial introduction of computers into the ICU. Since the mid-1960s computer systems for the ICU have evolved into the highly sophisticated bedside workstations commercially available today. Despite all of the technologic advances in computers, their application in ICUs in the United States continues to spread very slowly. One of the largest problems is justifying the cost of systems primarily designed to automate data charting and generation of care plans. Although the existing commercial systems do an excellent job, few conclusive studies prove that these systems have a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio. Research systems have demonstrated that if one extends these systems to incorporate a fully integrated database, decision-support tools, automation of data acquisition, and more sophisticated display and user-interface technology, then these ICU computer systems can have a significant impact on improving the quality and reducing the costs of patient care. For computers to be embraced in the ICU environment, commercial systems of the future must move beyond merely gathering and displaying information. They must help the clinician at the bedside assimilate the vast array of ICU data and help him to make more effective decisions.

Для цитирования: East T D. Computers in the ICU: panacea or plague?. Respiratory care. 1992.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.