MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831465

Медицинская библиотека · AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2004

Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability.

Middleton William D, Teefey Sharlene A, Yamaguchi Ken

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine the interobserver variability in the sonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

Two radiologists independently scanned 61 patients with shoulder pain. Each radiologist categorized the rotator cuff as normal, partially torn, or fully torn. When a tear was present, the tendons involved were specified. All diagnoses were made prospectively without knowledge of the findings of the other radiologist.

RESULTS

The radiologists were in full agreement in the categorization of 92% (56/61) of the patients. In four of the five discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether there was a full-thickness or a partial-thickness tear. The radiologists were in agreement concerning which tendons were involved in 80% (41/51) of the patients in whom a tear was detected by both observers. In all 10 discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether a tear involved both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons or was isolated to one or the other of these tendons.

CONCLUSION

The level of interobserver variability in the sonographic detection and characterization of rotator cuff tears is low.

Для цитирования: Middleton William D, Teefey Sharlene A, Yamaguchi Ken. Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability.. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2004. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831465.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.