Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2026
THE UNITÉ RHUMATOLOGIQUE DES AFFECTIONS DE LA MAIN (URAM): TRANSLATION INTO PORTUGUESE, CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sabongi Rodrigo Guerra, Vesco Yan Celuppi Dal, Lenzi Luiz Guilherme de Saboya, Dos Santos João Baptista Gomes, Belloti João Carlos, Faloppa Flávio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To translate and culturally adapt the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale, a specific instrument for functional assessment in Dupuytren's disease (DD), into Brazilian Portuguese.
METHODS: Following the methodology of Beaton (2000), the scale underwent five stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee, and pre-testing. After adaptation, the Brazilian version of the scale (URAM-BR) was administered to 40 patients with Dupuytren's contracture. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's alpha, reproducibility was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity was analyzed by correlation with the Brazilian version of QuickDASH.
RESULTS: The URAM-BR showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.930-0.938), significant reproducibility (ICC > 0.89), and moderate-to-strong construct validity (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). The adapted version proved to be clear, reliable, and appropriate to the Brazilian cultural context.
CONCLUSION: The URAM-BR is a valid, reliable, and reproducible instrument for functional assessment of patients with DD in Brazil. Level of evidence IV; Observational cross-sectional instrument validation study.
METHODS: Following the methodology of Beaton (2000), the scale underwent five stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee, and pre-testing. After adaptation, the Brazilian version of the scale (URAM-BR) was administered to 40 patients with Dupuytren's contracture. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's alpha, reproducibility was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity was analyzed by correlation with the Brazilian version of QuickDASH.
RESULTS: The URAM-BR showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.930-0.938), significant reproducibility (ICC > 0.89), and moderate-to-strong construct validity (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). The adapted version proved to be clear, reliable, and appropriate to the Brazilian cultural context.
CONCLUSION: The URAM-BR is a valid, reliable, and reproducible instrument for functional assessment of patients with DD in Brazil. Level of evidence IV; Observational cross-sectional instrument validation study.