MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bsd.0000000000002084

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical spine surgery · 2026

Adequacy of ChatGPT's Responses to Frequently Asked Questions for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Özgür Anil, Yüzügüldü Uğur, Tüzün Harun Yasin, Güveli Rifat, Erşen Ömer, Derincek Alihan, Özalay Metin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the answers of different versions of ChatGPT to frequently asked questions about AIS compiled from patient education websites the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) provide appropriate and sufficient information to patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Artificial intelligence chatbots have gained popularity due to their ability to analyze substantial scientific data using machine learning techniques and generate human-like responses in medicine. These responses can guide patients and families who are seeking information online after a diagnosis of AIS.

METHODS

Thirty frequently asked questions, selected by expert spine surgeons, were posed to 3 versions of ChatGPT using a new internet browser window for each question, and the responses were recorded. Three orthopedic spine surgeons graded the accuracy of the responses against 2 selected expert websites using a Likert scale. Finally, the response accuracy was evaluated for patient use.

RESULTS

Median Likert scores for ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-4o were 4 (1-5), 4 (2-5), and 4 (2-5), respectively. No significant differences were observed among versions within individual categories (all P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found in the overall response scores (P=0.004). Post hoc analysis revealed that ChatGPT-4o achieved significantly higher accuracy than ChatGPT-3.5 (P=0.005, Bonferroni-adjusted), whereas other pairwise comparisons were not significant. When the adequacy of the responses was evaluated, 26/30 (86%) of ChatGPT-3.5 responses were acceptable for patient use, whereas ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o provided appropriate responses in 29/30 (96%) of the questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Successive ChatGPT versions demonstrated improved response reliability, with ChatGPT-4o showing a statistically significant advantage over ChatGPT-3.5. Given that ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4o provided accurate and patient-appropriate answers in 96% of cases, these tools may assist in online patient education under clinician supervision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Для цитирования: Özgür Anil, Yüzügüldü Uğur, Tüzün Harun Yasin, Güveli Rifat, Erşen Ömer, Derincek Alihan, Özalay Metin. Adequacy of ChatGPT's Responses to Frequently Asked Questions for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.. Clinical spine surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000002084.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.