Acta oto-laryngologica · 2026
Impact of surgical technique on functional outcomes in C-type crooked nose correction.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Savran Fatih, Cirik Ahmet Adnan, Bayram Furkan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent surgery with the classical technique(CT) and the septal shift technique (SST) for crooked noses with C-shaped and reverse C-shaped deformities.
METHODS: Data from a total of 37 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty for crooked nose deformity in the last 4 years were collected. 26 patients were assigned to the classic technique group, and 11 patients to the septal shift technique group. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative photographs were taken. Nasal axis angles were measured using a computer program, and VAS were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were divided into two groups: 26 underwent the CT, and 11 underwent the SST. Postoperative angular improvement was significant in both groups (p < 0.05), with no difference between them (p > 0.05). The decrease in VAS was more pronounced in the septal shift group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both the CT and SST effectively correct C-type and reverse C-type crooked nose deformities. While both methods achieved similar angular improvements, the SST provided superior functional outcomes, as evidenced by a greater reduction in VAS. The SST may offer advantages in functional recovery, but both approaches are viable options in crooked nose surgery.
METHODS: Data from a total of 37 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty for crooked nose deformity in the last 4 years were collected. 26 patients were assigned to the classic technique group, and 11 patients to the septal shift technique group. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative photographs were taken. Nasal axis angles were measured using a computer program, and VAS were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were divided into two groups: 26 underwent the CT, and 11 underwent the SST. Postoperative angular improvement was significant in both groups (p < 0.05), with no difference between them (p > 0.05). The decrease in VAS was more pronounced in the septal shift group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both the CT and SST effectively correct C-type and reverse C-type crooked nose deformities. While both methods achieved similar angular improvements, the SST provided superior functional outcomes, as evidenced by a greater reduction in VAS. The SST may offer advantages in functional recovery, but both approaches are viable options in crooked nose surgery.