MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1476-8518-1-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of immune based therapies and vaccines · 2003

A Canadian national survey of attitudes and knowledge regarding preventive vaccines.

Ritvo Paul, Irvine Jane, Klar Neil, Wilson Kumanan, Brown Laura, Bremner Karen E, Rinfret Aline, Remis Robert, Krahn Murray D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Vaccines have virtually eliminated many diseases, but public concerns about their safety could undermine future public health initiatives.

OBJECTIVE

To determine Canadians' attitudes and knowledge about vaccines, particularly in view of increasing public concern about bioterrorism and the possible need for emergency immunizations after weaponized anthrax incidents and the events of September 11, 2001. METHOD: A 20-question survey based on well-researched dimensions of vaccine responsiveness was telephone-administered to a random sample of N = 1330 adult Canadians in January, 2002.

RESULTS

1057 (79.5%) completed the survey. Respondents perceived vaccines to be highly effective and demonstrated considerable support for further vaccine research. However, results also indicate a lack of knowledge about vaccines and uncertainty regarding the safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Support for vaccines is broad but shallow. While Canadians hold generally positive attitudes about vaccines, support could be undermined by widely publicized adverse events. Better public education is required to maintain support for future public health initiatives.

Для цитирования: Ritvo Paul, Irvine Jane, Klar Neil, Wilson Kumanan, Brown Laura, Bremner Karen E, Rinfret Aline, Remis Robert, Krahn Murray D. A Canadian national survey of attitudes and knowledge regarding preventive vaccines.. Journal of immune based therapies and vaccines. 2003. DOI: 10.1186/1476-8518-1-3.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.