MedElevator
Войти в исследования The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2026
Increasing levels of craniocervical junction fusion increase cervical annulus stress and facet joint forces while decreasing cervical motion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson James M, Karren Ellie, Dailey Andrew T, Brockmeyer Douglas L, Ellis Benjamin J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preventing cervical adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a priority in spine surgery, because its onset can result in recurrent symptoms and undermine the durability of surgical intervention. However, the biomechanical effects of craniocervical junction (CCJ) fusion on the adjacent annulus and facet joint forces (FJFs) that contribute to the risk of ASD after surgery are poorly understood.
PURPOSE: To elucidate the biomechanical effects of FJFs and annulus fibrosus (AF) stresses on the subaxial cervical spine caused by fusion in the CCJ.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A finite element (FE) analysis of the adult cervical spine.
PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 3 patient-specific FE models developed from a 26-year-old woman, a 59-year-old woman, and a 64-year-old woman.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Subaxial AF stresses, FJFs, and total cervical range of motion (ROM) were analyzed.
METHODS: The previously validated FE models from occiput to C7 were modified to simulate 4 fusion constructs: unfused, atlantoaxial fusion (AAF, C1-C2), occipitocervical fusion (OCF, occiput-C2), and extended OCF (eOCF, occiput-C5). Each model was loaded with physiological torques and applied motions in flexion/extension and right/left axial rotation. Results were collated via data clustering, and multilevel linear regression was used for analysis.
RESULTS: FE analysis demonstrated that forces measured in adjacent and unfused facet joints significantly increased with fusion length by 606%±429%, 1772%±1449%, and 24,722%±21,729% in the AAF, OCF, and eOCF constructs, respectively. AF stress also increased significantly by 161%±93%, 408%±211%, and 1833%±1398% in the AAF, OCF, and eOCF constructs, respectively. Differences in AF stress and FJF were significant among all fusion levels (p<.0005) and were seen regardless of load direction or distance from fusion. ROM significantly decreased (p<.0005) as the fusion length increased, with mean ranges of motion of 46.9±5.0°, 32.1±4.2°, 24.0±3.4°, and 10.2±1.0° in the unfused, AAF, OCF, and eOCF models, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a clear connection between the length of CCJ fusion and factors that have been linked to ASD development. Furthermore, our evidence shows that each additional joint fused significantly limits cervical ROM. We recommend caution to avoid extending CCJ fusions beyond necessity.
PURPOSE: To elucidate the biomechanical effects of FJFs and annulus fibrosus (AF) stresses on the subaxial cervical spine caused by fusion in the CCJ.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A finite element (FE) analysis of the adult cervical spine.
PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 3 patient-specific FE models developed from a 26-year-old woman, a 59-year-old woman, and a 64-year-old woman.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Subaxial AF stresses, FJFs, and total cervical range of motion (ROM) were analyzed.
METHODS: The previously validated FE models from occiput to C7 were modified to simulate 4 fusion constructs: unfused, atlantoaxial fusion (AAF, C1-C2), occipitocervical fusion (OCF, occiput-C2), and extended OCF (eOCF, occiput-C5). Each model was loaded with physiological torques and applied motions in flexion/extension and right/left axial rotation. Results were collated via data clustering, and multilevel linear regression was used for analysis.
RESULTS: FE analysis demonstrated that forces measured in adjacent and unfused facet joints significantly increased with fusion length by 606%±429%, 1772%±1449%, and 24,722%±21,729% in the AAF, OCF, and eOCF constructs, respectively. AF stress also increased significantly by 161%±93%, 408%±211%, and 1833%±1398% in the AAF, OCF, and eOCF constructs, respectively. Differences in AF stress and FJF were significant among all fusion levels (p<.0005) and were seen regardless of load direction or distance from fusion. ROM significantly decreased (p<.0005) as the fusion length increased, with mean ranges of motion of 46.9±5.0°, 32.1±4.2°, 24.0±3.4°, and 10.2±1.0° in the unfused, AAF, OCF, and eOCF models, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a clear connection between the length of CCJ fusion and factors that have been linked to ASD development. Furthermore, our evidence shows that each additional joint fused significantly limits cervical ROM. We recommend caution to avoid extending CCJ fusions beyond necessity.