DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2026.08.023
The relationship between limb dominance and 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To our knowledge there is no current literature evaluating the relationship between 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthritis and limb dominance.
PURPOSE: This proposed retrospective study sought to evaluate if a relationship exists between limb dominance and the development of 1st MTPJ arthritis.
STUDY
DESIGN
A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 1st, 2018-January 1st, 2024 on patients who underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis by surgeons throughout all locations at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist.
METHODS
We hypothesized that patients would develop 1st MTPJ arthritis in their dominant foot. We hypothesized that patients would develop 1st MTPJ arthritis on the ipsilateral side of their dominant hand. Patients were contacted by telephone and after consenting, were asked 4 questions to determine leg dominance and 4 questions to determine hand dominance.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients over the age of 18, who underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ arthritis. Patients who identified as ambidextrous, and patients with hallux valgus were excluded.
RESULTS
Forty patients who met the inclusion criteria completed the telephone survey. Twenty seven of 40 patients underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis on their dominant foot. Twenty eight of 40 patients underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis on the foot ipsilateral to their dominant hand. The observed agreement for both hand and leg dominance was significantly higher than 50%, p = 0.017 and p = 0.039, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The study shows that most patients developed 1st MTPJ arthritis in their dominant foot. Also, most patients developed 1st MTPJ arthritis on the foot ipsilateral to their dominant hand.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.