MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00774-026-01736-w

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026

24-month real-world persistence and compliance of denosumab versus alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Australia, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore.

Lau Tang Ching, Chang Dong-Gune, Chen Chung-Hwan, Huang Shuang, Lau Edith M C, Law Sheung-Wai, Lee Young-Kyun, Tolman Cae, Canals Laura, Yeo See-Hwee, Ebeling Peter R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

To compare 24-month persistence and compliance of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis across 5 Asia-Pacific territories.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included women aged ≥ 50 years from Australia, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Participants received either a bi-annual denosumab injection or weekly oral alendronate as osteoporosis treatment, based on physician judgment. Multivariable logistic regression assessed whether therapy (denosumab or alendronate) was significantly associated with treatment persistence and compliance over 24 months of follow-up. The models were adjusted for age, fracture history, baseline bone mineral density (BMD), prior osteoporosis therapy, and prior oral glucocorticoid treatment. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 687 enrolled patients, 549 completed their 24-month visit (295 in denosumab and 254 in alendronate group). Patients in the denosumab group were older and a higher proportion previously received osteoporosis treatment. Overall treatment persistence and compliance were 74.9% and 56.6%, respectively. Patients prescribed with denosumab exhibited higher persistence (86.1% vs. 61.8%; P < 0.001) and compliance (62.4% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.004), compared with those on alendronate. Regression results also demonstrated that patients receiving denosumab were more likely to be persistent (aOR = 3.91; 95% CI 2.52-6.08), and compliant (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.12-2.31). BMD T-scores improved in both the treatment groups after 24 months with no significant association between treatment type and change in T-score. No significant difference was also observed in the occurrence of adverse events between the two treatment cohorts. Patients on alendronate reported gastrointestinal issues more frequently, whereas those on denosumab had a higher incidence of bone and joint injuries.

CONCLUSION

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were more likely to be persistent and compliant with a bi-annual denosumab injection, compared with weekly oral alendronate.

Для цитирования: Lau Tang Ching, Chang Dong-Gune, Chen Chung-Hwan, Huang Shuang, Lau Edith M C, Law Sheung-Wai, Lee Young-Kyun, Tolman Cae, Canals Laura, Yeo See-Hwee, Ebeling Peter R. 24-month real-world persistence and compliance of denosumab versus alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Australia, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore.. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-026-01736-w.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.