Skeletal radiology · 2019
Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in the detection of clinically diagnosed de Quervain's syndrome: a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McBain Brodwen, Rio Ebonie, Cook Jill, Grabinski Rafal, Docking Sean
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To collate and synthesise the literature to provide estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities, and summarise the reported imaging findings associated with de Quervain's syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global). Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction and quality assessment using a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were summarised for different modalities and imaging findings.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, reporting ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray and scintigraphy findings. Reported imaging findings included sheath effusion, retinaculum thickening, subcutaneous oedema, tenosynovitis, hypervascularity, increased tendon size, bony erosion, apposition, calcific lesions and increased uptake on scintigraphy. The most commonly reported imaging findings related to the tendon sheath, with a sensitivity ranging from 0.45 to 1.00 for thickening, and 0.29 to 1.00 for effusions. The risk of bias of studies is largely unclear owing to a lack of reported detail.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of imaging in the diagnosis of de Quervain's syndrome is unable to be determined because of the quality of the studies included. Ultrasound is the most frequently studied imaging modality and may be the modality of choice in clinical practice. Further research involving both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants and clear definitions of abnormal findings are required to better evaluate the effectiveness of imaging in identifying de Quervain's syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global). Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction and quality assessment using a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were summarised for different modalities and imaging findings.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, reporting ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray and scintigraphy findings. Reported imaging findings included sheath effusion, retinaculum thickening, subcutaneous oedema, tenosynovitis, hypervascularity, increased tendon size, bony erosion, apposition, calcific lesions and increased uptake on scintigraphy. The most commonly reported imaging findings related to the tendon sheath, with a sensitivity ranging from 0.45 to 1.00 for thickening, and 0.29 to 1.00 for effusions. The risk of bias of studies is largely unclear owing to a lack of reported detail.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of imaging in the diagnosis of de Quervain's syndrome is unable to be determined because of the quality of the studies included. Ultrasound is the most frequently studied imaging modality and may be the modality of choice in clinical practice. Further research involving both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants and clear definitions of abnormal findings are required to better evaluate the effectiveness of imaging in identifying de Quervain's syndrome.