Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2019
Central fatigue is greater than peripheral fatigue in people with joint hypermobility syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
To May, Strutton Paul H, Alexander Caroline M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: People with Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS) suffer with fatigue. The purpose of this project was to investigate the contribution of central and peripheral fatigue.
METHODS: Electrical stimulation of the musculocutaneous nerve to biceps brachii, and transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex supplying biceps brachii were used. Peripheral and central fatigue were assessed during a control, fatiguing and recovery phase protocol.
RESULTS: JHS participants perceived greater fatigue during the protocol compared to a control group and did not recover. Central and peripheral fatigue did not occur in the control group. However, the JHS group showed central fatigue. MEP amplitude increased in the JHS group during the fatiguing protocol (p < 0.01) before recovering. Superimposed twitch amplitude increased in the JHS group during the fatiguing protocol and stayed elevated during the recovery phase (p < 0.04). Time to peak (TTP) amplitude of the torque generated by the TMS was longer in the JHS group (p < 0.05). RMS during MVCs decreased during the fatiguing protocol reaching significance during the recovery phase (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: JHS participants suffered central but not peripheral fatigue. A modified strength programme to target this is discussed.
METHODS: Electrical stimulation of the musculocutaneous nerve to biceps brachii, and transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex supplying biceps brachii were used. Peripheral and central fatigue were assessed during a control, fatiguing and recovery phase protocol.
RESULTS: JHS participants perceived greater fatigue during the protocol compared to a control group and did not recover. Central and peripheral fatigue did not occur in the control group. However, the JHS group showed central fatigue. MEP amplitude increased in the JHS group during the fatiguing protocol (p < 0.01) before recovering. Superimposed twitch amplitude increased in the JHS group during the fatiguing protocol and stayed elevated during the recovery phase (p < 0.04). Time to peak (TTP) amplitude of the torque generated by the TMS was longer in the JHS group (p < 0.05). RMS during MVCs decreased during the fatiguing protocol reaching significance during the recovery phase (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: JHS participants suffered central but not peripheral fatigue. A modified strength programme to target this is discussed.