MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0670-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2017

Arthroscopic internal drainage and cystectomy of popliteal cyst in knee osteoarthritis.

Jiang Jun, Ni Lei

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic knee cavity internal drainage and cyst cavity debridement operation of popliteal cyst in knee osteoarthritis patients.

METHODS

From August 2007 to March 2013, 58 knee osteoarthritis patients with popliteal cyst were treated with arthroscopic knee cavity internal drainage through posteromedial portal and popliteal cyst cavity debridement through superior posteromedial portal. In all patients, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to detect combined intra-articular pathology and the communication between popliteal cyst and knee cavity. Clinical efficacy was evaluated through VAS score and Lysholm score.

RESULTS

All patients had neither recurrence of popliteal cyst nor complaints of pain, swelling, or functional impairment at average 24 months follow-up after surgery. Postoperatively, VAS score was decreased significantly and Lysholm score was raised significantly comparing preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic knee cavity internal drainage operation through posteromedial portal and popliteal cyst cavity debridement through superior posteromedial portal is an effective minimally invasive surgery method for the treatment of popliteal cyst without recurrence in knee osteoarthritis patients.

Для цитирования: Jiang Jun, Ni Lei. Arthroscopic internal drainage and cystectomy of popliteal cyst in knee osteoarthritis.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0670-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.