Folia medica · 2015
Selection Of The Optimal Level Of Distal Fixation For Correction Of Scheuermann's Hyperkyphosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mikhaylovskiy Mikhail V, Sorokin Artem N, Novikov Vjacheslav V, Vasyura Alexander S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of the method for selecting the distal level of fusion in treatment of thoracic hyperkyphosis in patients with Scheuermann's disease.
BACKGROUND: The fusion area needs to include all the kyphotic deformity in Scheuermann patients; however, precise levels of the distal fixation have not been determined yet.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients were operated in the Department of Children and Adolescent Spine Pathology between 2007 and 2010. These patients were divided into two groups: in group I (n = 29) a lower instrumented vertebra corresponded to the sagittal stable one and in group II (n = 7) - this vertebra located proximally.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative kyphosis was 79.3° ± 11.6°, the postoperative - 40.6° ± 11.9° (correction of 49.9%), loss of correction was 4.9° ± 7.0°. Sagittal balance changed from -0.3 ± 3.2 cm before surgery to -1.7 ± 2.1 cm after surgery. Distal junctional kyphosis developed in 1 case (4%) in Group I, and in 5 cases (71%) in Group II.
CONCLUSION: A distal level of instrumentation ending at the first lordotic vertebra is not justified and causes violation of sagittal balance and development of distal junctional kyphosis. The inclusion of a sagittal stable vertebra in fusion prevents the development of this undesirable situation.
BACKGROUND: The fusion area needs to include all the kyphotic deformity in Scheuermann patients; however, precise levels of the distal fixation have not been determined yet.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients were operated in the Department of Children and Adolescent Spine Pathology between 2007 and 2010. These patients were divided into two groups: in group I (n = 29) a lower instrumented vertebra corresponded to the sagittal stable one and in group II (n = 7) - this vertebra located proximally.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative kyphosis was 79.3° ± 11.6°, the postoperative - 40.6° ± 11.9° (correction of 49.9%), loss of correction was 4.9° ± 7.0°. Sagittal balance changed from -0.3 ± 3.2 cm before surgery to -1.7 ± 2.1 cm after surgery. Distal junctional kyphosis developed in 1 case (4%) in Group I, and in 5 cases (71%) in Group II.
CONCLUSION: A distal level of instrumentation ending at the first lordotic vertebra is not justified and causes violation of sagittal balance and development of distal junctional kyphosis. The inclusion of a sagittal stable vertebra in fusion prevents the development of this undesirable situation.