The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2026
Efficacy of spinal manipulative therapy in older adults with chronic spinal conditions: an updated systematic review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schielke Alec L, Trager Robert J, Stevans Joel M, Price Morgan R, Wilcox Ronald D, Walters Sheryl A, Daniels Clinton J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of SMT for chronic spinal conditions in adults aged 55 years and older.
METHODS: We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SMT for older adults with chronic spinal conditions (≥ 12 weeks) published from February 2016 through October 2024. Additionally, studies from the prior article being updated were included as appropriate. Eligible studies compared SMT to active or inert comparators, measuring pain, function, or quality of life.
RESULTS: Nine reports were included, evaluating SMT for chronic low back pain (5 RCTs, n=544), chronic neck pain (2 RCTs, n=241), lumbar spinal stenosis (1 RCT, n=259), and combined neck/back disability (1 RCT, n=182).
CONCLUSION: SMT may offer comparable or modestly greater benefit than other treatments for chronic spinal conditions in older adults, particularly for neck pain and LSS. Evidence certainty remains very low to moderate.
REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CDR42024615084).
METHODS: We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SMT for older adults with chronic spinal conditions (≥ 12 weeks) published from February 2016 through October 2024. Additionally, studies from the prior article being updated were included as appropriate. Eligible studies compared SMT to active or inert comparators, measuring pain, function, or quality of life.
RESULTS: Nine reports were included, evaluating SMT for chronic low back pain (5 RCTs, n=544), chronic neck pain (2 RCTs, n=241), lumbar spinal stenosis (1 RCT, n=259), and combined neck/back disability (1 RCT, n=182).
CONCLUSION: SMT may offer comparable or modestly greater benefit than other treatments for chronic spinal conditions in older adults, particularly for neck pain and LSS. Evidence certainty remains very low to moderate.
REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CDR42024615084).