MedElevator
Войти в исследования Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2024
Tubular phosphate transport: a comparison between different methods of urine sample collection in FGF23-dependent hypophosphatemic syndromes.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arcidiacono Gaetano Paride, Camozzi Valentina, Zaninotto Martina, Tripepi Giovanni, Fusaro Maria, Torres Marco Onofrio, Zanchetta Francesca, Cannito Michele, Cecchinato Alberta, Diogo Martin, Peleg Falb Mor, Plebani Mario, Simioni Paolo, Sella Stefania, Giannini Sandro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Tubular maximum phosphate reabsorption per glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) is used to evaluate renal phosphate reabsorption and it is a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of hypophosphatemic syndromes. TmP/GFR is typically calculated from fasting plasma and second morning void urine samples, obtained 2 h after the first void (TmP/GFR 2 h). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if TmP/GFR calculated from 24 h urine collection (TmP/GFR 24 h) can be used as an alternative for TmP/GFR 2 h in patients with urine phosphate wasting.
METHODS: We enrolled adult patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) or tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). All patients underwent blood and urine sample collections, to calculate TmP/GFR 24 h and TmP/GFR 2 h.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (17 XLH and 3 TIO), aged 24-78 years, were included. All patients had low TmP/GFR 2 h (0.35 mmol/L, IQR 0.24-0.47 mmol/L) and TmP/GFR 24 h (0.31 mmol/L, IQR 0.22-0.43 mmol/L). The concordance correlation coefficient between TmP/GFR 2 h and TmP/GFR 24 h was 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.93), with a systematic bias of 0.05 mmol/L (95 % limits of agreement: -0.10 to 0.20). Furthermore, in 70 % (i.e., 14 patients out of 20) and 80 % (i.e., 16 patients out of 20) of cases the difference between TmP/GFR 2 h and TmP/GFR 24 h was within ±30 % and ±35 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite TmP/GFR 2 and 24 h show a relatively suboptimal agreement, the difference between the two parameters appears to be small and not clinically significant in the setting of adult patients with FGF23-dependent urine phosphate wasting and secondary hypophosphatemia.
METHODS: We enrolled adult patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) or tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). All patients underwent blood and urine sample collections, to calculate TmP/GFR 24 h and TmP/GFR 2 h.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (17 XLH and 3 TIO), aged 24-78 years, were included. All patients had low TmP/GFR 2 h (0.35 mmol/L, IQR 0.24-0.47 mmol/L) and TmP/GFR 24 h (0.31 mmol/L, IQR 0.22-0.43 mmol/L). The concordance correlation coefficient between TmP/GFR 2 h and TmP/GFR 24 h was 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.93), with a systematic bias of 0.05 mmol/L (95 % limits of agreement: -0.10 to 0.20). Furthermore, in 70 % (i.e., 14 patients out of 20) and 80 % (i.e., 16 patients out of 20) of cases the difference between TmP/GFR 2 h and TmP/GFR 24 h was within ±30 % and ±35 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite TmP/GFR 2 and 24 h show a relatively suboptimal agreement, the difference between the two parameters appears to be small and not clinically significant in the setting of adult patients with FGF23-dependent urine phosphate wasting and secondary hypophosphatemia.