DOI 10.1186/s12891-026-09776-z
Regional hip bone density patterns in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures: a single-center retrospective study of 500 older adults in midtown Shanghai.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Hip fragility fractures in older adults commonly present as femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures, which may reflect different regional deficits in proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD). This study assessed whether QCT-derived regional hip BMD patterns can distinguish femoral neck from intertrochanteric fragility fractures.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of 500 patients aged ≥65 years (2020–2024). QCT-derived T-scores for femoral neck (FN), trochanter (FT), intertrochanter (IT), and total hip (TH) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression (age, sex, FT T-score, TH T-score) identified predictors; a point-based score was derived.
RESULTS
Fracture types: 277 femoral neck, 223 intertrochanteric; mean age 80.2±7.7 years. Intertrochanteric cases were older (82.6±7.2 vs 78.3±7.5, p<0.01) with lower regional T-scores (all p<0.01). FT T-score was the strongest discriminator (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.35, p<0.001). Higher TH T-score paradoxically associated with intertrochanteric fractures (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.35–3.44, p=0.001), indicating focal trochanteric deficit relative to preserved composite density. Men with intertrochanteric fractures showed localized trochanteric loss; women demonstrated more diffuse decline. Final model AUC 0.747 (95% CI 0.704–0.791).
CONCLUSIONS
QCT-derived regional hip T-score patterns, particularly the trochanteric T-score, help differentiate femoral neck from intertrochanteric fragility fractures. The discordance between low trochanteric and relatively preserved total hip density may provide a useful phenotype for fracture characterization and risk stratification.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.