Complications and costs of patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis. Although PFA may preserve native kinematics and accelerate recovery, it has been associated with higher revision rates. The purpose of this study is to compare complication rates and costs between PFA and TKA.

METHODS

Using the PearlDiver database, 6,179 patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis treated with PFA or TKA from 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed with 5-year follow up. PFA and TKA patients were matched by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index via a 1:1 stepwise algorithm. Five-year costs and complications were compared between matched cohorts. The lifetime costs of PFA and TKA were evaluated with Markov decision modeling.

RESULTS

Compared to TKA, PFA was associated with fewer Emergency Department (ED) visits (6.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.004) but a higher 5-year revision rate (9.9% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001). After multivariate regression, PFA was independently more likely to require revision (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.32-4.71, p = 0.003). PFA was associated with lower total healthcare costs at every time point between 3 months ($18,014 vs $26,473, p < 0.001) and 5 years ($20,837 vs $27,942, p < 0.001). On average, the lifetime cost of PFA per patient was $5,235 less than for TKA ($26,343 vs $31,578).

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is a less expensive alternative to TKA with a similar risk of medical complications but is associated with a significantly higher 5-year revision rate. Future studies should examine the reasons for PFA failure and methods to mitigate this risk.