The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
International perspective on obtaining disease modification with food allergy therapies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anagnostou Aikaterini, Bégin Phillipe, Eiwegger Thomas, Greenhawt Matthew, Mack Douglas P, Togias Alkis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A disease-modifying therapy aims to alter natural history by delaying or reversing disease progression.
OBJECTIVE: We examined expert opinion regarding the concept of disease modification in food allergy to assess consensus, definitions, and identification of relevant biomarkers.
METHODS: We contextualized relevant definitions to terms such as desensitization, sustained unresponsiveness, tolerance, and remission; and evaluated evidence-based disease-modifying effects of therapeutic strategies.
RESULTS: Evidence from oral, epicutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy demonstrates that desensitization is common and that a subset of patients has disease with sustained unresponsiveness or remission after treatment discontinuation. Younger age and lower baseline allergen-specific IgE may predict more durable responses. Immunologic changes associated with these outcomes include suppression of type 2 cellular responses, modulation of B-cell compartments, and induction of blocking antibodies. Currently approved biologics enhance protection during active treatment but have limited evidence for direct disease modification, although they may facilitate tolerance when combined with allergen exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: While the clinical states of desensitization, sustained unresponsiveness, tolerance, and remission may involve partial or complete disease modification in food allergy, no consensus definition exists, and no relevant biomarkers have been identified to date.
OBJECTIVE: We examined expert opinion regarding the concept of disease modification in food allergy to assess consensus, definitions, and identification of relevant biomarkers.
METHODS: We contextualized relevant definitions to terms such as desensitization, sustained unresponsiveness, tolerance, and remission; and evaluated evidence-based disease-modifying effects of therapeutic strategies.
RESULTS: Evidence from oral, epicutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy demonstrates that desensitization is common and that a subset of patients has disease with sustained unresponsiveness or remission after treatment discontinuation. Younger age and lower baseline allergen-specific IgE may predict more durable responses. Immunologic changes associated with these outcomes include suppression of type 2 cellular responses, modulation of B-cell compartments, and induction of blocking antibodies. Currently approved biologics enhance protection during active treatment but have limited evidence for direct disease modification, although they may facilitate tolerance when combined with allergen exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: While the clinical states of desensitization, sustained unresponsiveness, tolerance, and remission may involve partial or complete disease modification in food allergy, no consensus definition exists, and no relevant biomarkers have been identified to date.