MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000035556

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2023

The causal relationship between depression and frozen shoulder: A two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Deng Guang-Hua, Wei Yong-Kang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To investigate the causal relationship between depression and frozen shoulder using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Pooled data from a large-scale genome-wide association study were used. Genetic loci that were independent of each other and associated with depression and frozen shoulder in populations of European ancestry were selected as instrumental variables. Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary analysis method. Weighted median and MR-Egger were used as complementary analysis methods to assess causal effects. To explore the causal relationship between depression and frozen shoulder. Sensitivity test analysis was performed using heterogeneity test, multiple validity test, and leave-one-out analysis to explore the robustness of the results. Inverse variance weighting results showed an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.18 (0.91-1.53), P = .204, indicating that depression was not causally related to the development of frozen shoulder. And the test revealed no heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and the sensitivity analysis also showed robust results. In this study, genetic data were analyzed and explored using a two-sample MR analysis, and the results showed no causal relationship between depression and the occurrence of frozen shoulder, requiring the inclusion of a larger sample for the study.

Для цитирования: Deng Guang-Hua, Wei Yong-Kang. The causal relationship between depression and frozen shoulder: A two-sample Mendelian randomization.. Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035556.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.