Efficacy and safety of anakinra for acute calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease flare: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) is a common inflammatory arthritis among older adults. Comorbidities often limit conventional treatment of acute CPPD flare. Anakinra, an interleukin-1 inhibitor, is a promising alternative. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra in acute CPPD flares.
METHODS
We systematically searched studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database up until August 2024. The primary outcome was a positive treatment response between Day 3 and Day 5 after anakinra initiation. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain ratings assessed by the visual analogue scales (VAS), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, tender joint counts (TJCs), swollen joint counts (SJCs), and steroid usage.
RESULTS
Six studies were included in our meta-analysis: five observational studies and one randomized controlled trial. A total of 84 patients were included in our analysis. Subjective physician assessments of clinical response were reported in all studies with a combined positive treatment response rate of 76% (95% CI: 61-86, I2 = 0%). Our pooled analysis also showed a significant reduction of VAS scores by 48.12 mm (95% CI: 53.21-43.03, I2 = 0%) and CRP levels by 62.09 mg/L (95% CI: 97.74-26.44, I2 = 77%) from baseline. Reductions of TJC and SJC were also demonstrated: 4.86 (95% CI: 5.48-4.23, I2 = 0%) and 3.65 (95% CI: -12.53 to 5.22, I2 = 54%), respectively. Adverse reactions included injection site reaction, rash, bacterial pneumonitis, and neutropenia.
CONCLUSIONS
Anakinra is a promising alternative treatment for patients with acute CPPD flare as it showed desirable clinical responses and a favourable safety profile.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.