MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/21925682261478537

Медицинская библиотека · Global spine journal · 2026

Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures and MCID Achievement in Patients With Radiculopathy Undergoing Open Versus MIS TLIF.

Ng Mitchell, Baek Gregorio, Miloh Roy Y, Mathew Joshua, Lee Yulia, Hitchner Morgan, Green William, Eichbaum Yasmine, Banko Steven J, Patel Keyur, Stump Kyle, Uvarov Evgeniy V, Farooqi Ali, Martinazzi Brandon, Giakas Alec, Dalton Jonathan, Hilibrand Alan S, Vaccaro Alexander R, Schroeder Gregory D, Kepler Christopher K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveTo compare postoperative outcomes between open versus minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with predominant radiculopathy symptoms.MethodsAll adult patients undergoing open and MIS single level TLIF (2017-2024) were retrospectively identified. Patients were included if they had preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Patients with predominant radiculopathy symptoms were identified if their preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) leg score was greater than their VAS back score.ResultsA total of 220 patients were included (open TLIF: 155; MIS TLIF: 65). Patients had similar age, sex, race, BMI, and CCI (all p>0.05). Patients in the MIS cohort more frequently had PPO/HMO insurance (55.4% versus 39.0%; P = 0.034). Regarding surgical characteristics, patients who underwent MIS TLIF had shorter length of stay (LOS) (1.71 versus 2.39 days; P < 0.001), proportionally greater routine discharge home (98.2% versus 87.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased estimated blood loss (EBL) (64.1 versus 292 mL; P < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative PROM values, delta PROM values, or achievement of minimal clinically important difference between groups.ConclusionDespite similar postoperative clinical outcomes, patients with predominant radiculopathy symptoms undergoing MIS TLIF had favorable LOS, discharge disposition, and EBL compared to patients undergoing open TLIF.

Для цитирования: Ng Mitchell, Baek Gregorio, Miloh Roy Y, Mathew Joshua, Lee Yulia, Hitchner Morgan, Green William, Eichbaum Yasmine, Banko Steven J, Patel Keyur, Stump Kyle, Uvarov Evgeniy V, Farooqi Ali, Martinazzi Brandon, Giakas Alec, Dalton Jonathan, Hilibrand Alan S, Vaccaro Alexander R, Schroeder Gregory D, Kepler Christopher K. Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures and MCID Achievement in Patients With Radiculopathy Undergoing Open Versus MIS TLIF.. Global spine journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/21925682261478537.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.