MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/occmed/kql084

Медицинская библиотека · Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2006

Conservative treatment of work-related upper limb disorders: a review.

Crawford Joanne O, Laiou Elpiniki

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The literature review was carried out to identify and summarize the evidence-base for conservative clinical management of upper limb disorders (ULDs) including specific disorders and non-specific ULDs.

METHOD: Keywords were identified through a scoping study and guidance from the project sponsor. A number of databases were searched including Web of Knowledge, Pub Med, Medline, Ergonomics Online, the Cochrane Library and BMJ Clinical Evidence for the years 1993-2004. Abstracts were obtained for papers identified in the search and full papers were obtained for literature, which included diagnostic methods, conservative treatments, new data or results or systematic reviews.

RESULTS

The review identified that there is evidence for the efficacy of conservative treatments for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome, epicondylitis, rotator cuff tendonitis and bicipital tendonitis and tension neck syndrome. There was no evidence found to support or refute conservative treatment of tenosynovitis, tendonitis, de Quervain's disease or diffuse non-specific ULDs.

CONCLUSION

The evidence reviewed was not always of good quality and data gaps including methodological design issues need to be addressed by future research.

Для цитирования: Crawford Joanne O, Laiou Elpiniki. Conservative treatment of work-related upper limb disorders: a review.. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England). 2006. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kql084.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.