MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/ard-2023-225278

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024

Validation and incorporation of digital entheses into a preliminary GLobal OMERACT Ultrasound DActylitis Score (GLOUDAS) in psoriatic arthritis.

Naredo Esperanza, D'Agostino Maria Antonietta, Terslev Lene, Pineda Carlos, Miguel M Isabel, Blasi Joan, Bruyn George A, Kortekaas Marion C, Mandl Peter, Nestorova Rodina, Szkudlarek Marcin, Todorov Plamen, Vlad Violeta, Wong Priscilla, Bakewell Catherine, Filippucci Emilio, Zabotti Alen, Micu Mihaela, Vreju Florentin, Mortada Mohamed, Mendonça José Alexandre, Guillen-Astete Carlos A, Olivas-Vergara Otto, Iagnocco Annamaria, Hanova Petra, Tinazzi Ilaria, Balint Peter V, Aydin Sibel Zehra, Kane David, Keen Helen, Kaeley Gurjit S, Möller Ingrid

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to generate a GLobal OMERACT Ultrasound DActylitis Score (GLOUDAS) in psoriatic arthritis and to test its reliability. To this end, we assessed the validity, feasibility and applicability of ultrasound assessment of finger entheses to incorporate them into the scoring system.

METHODS

The study consisted of a stepwise process. First, in cadaveric specimens, we identified enthesis sites of the fingers by ultrasound and gross anatomy, and then verified presence of entheseal tissue in histological samples. We then selected the entheses to be incorporated into a dactylitis scoring system through a Delphi consensus process among international experts. Next, we established and defined the ultrasound components of dactylitis and their scoring systems using Delphi methodology. Finally, we tested the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the consensus- based scoring systemin patients with psoriatic dactylitis.

RESULTS

32 entheses were identified in cadaveric fingers. The presence of entheseal tissues was confirmed in all cadaveric samples. Of these, following the consensus process, 12 entheses were selected for inclusion in GLOUDAS. Ultrasound components of GLOUDAS agreed on through the Delphi process were synovitis, tenosynovitis, enthesitis, subcutaneous tissue inflammation and periextensor tendon inflammation. The scoring system for each component was also agreed on. Interobserver reliability was fair to good (κ 0.39-0.71) and intraobserver reliability good to excellent (κ 0.80-0.88) for dactylitis components. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the total B-mode and Doppler mode scores (sum of the scores of the individual abnormalities) were excellent (interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.98 for B-mode and 0.99 for Doppler mode; intraobserver ICC 0.98 for both modes).

CONCLUSIONS

We have produced a consensus-driven ultrasound dactylitis scoring system that has shown acceptable interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability. Through anatomical knowledge, small entheses of the fingers were identified and histologically validated.

Для цитирования: Naredo Esperanza, D'Agostino Maria Antonietta, Terslev Lene, Pineda Carlos, Miguel M Isabel, Blasi Joan, Bruyn George A, Kortekaas Marion C, Mandl Peter, Nestorova Rodina, Szkudlarek Marcin, Todorov Plamen, Vlad Violeta, Wong Priscilla, Bakewell Catherine, Filippucci Emilio, Zabotti Alen, Micu Mihaela, Vreju Florentin, Mortada Mohamed, Mendonça José Alexandre, Guillen-Astete Carlos A, Olivas-Vergara Otto, Iagnocco Annamaria, Hanova Petra, Tinazzi Ilaria, Balint Peter V, Aydin Sibel Zehra, Kane David, Keen Helen, Kaeley Gurjit S, Möller Ingrid. Validation and incorporation of digital entheses into a preliminary GLobal OMERACT Ultrasound DActylitis Score (GLOUDAS) in psoriatic arthritis.. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-225278.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.