MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.018

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of internal medicine · 2023

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Liao Jiafen, Peng Xiaofei, Liu Jiayi, Xie Xi, Wang Jia

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) treatment.

METHODS

We searched the Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were used as searching tools from inception up to October 2022. Two authors independently selected studies. The available studies were comprehensively reviewed and investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies, including 350 patients, were analysed. Pooled results showed a higher overall survival rate in tacrolimus therapy group. Creatine kinase (CK) levels and forced vital capacity (FVC) showed significant improvement after tacrolimus therapy. The incidence of adverse events including infection and renal dysfunction showed no significant differences between the tacrolimus therapy group and conventional therapy group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that GC therapy in combination with tacrolimus therapy could help improving overall survival rate, pulmonary function and had similar safety outcomes compared to conventional therapy in DM and PM patients.

Для цитирования: Liao Jiafen, Peng Xiaofei, Liu Jiayi, Xie Xi, Wang Jia. The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.. European journal of internal medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.