MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2011

Detailed analysis of graft techniques for nasal reconstruction following Wegener granulomatosis.

Sepehr Ali, Alexander Ashlin J, Chauhan Nitin, Gantous Andres

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Saddle nose deformity secondary to Wegener granulomatosis (WG) presents a significant challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. Various grafting options have been proposed, but achieving good outcomes can be difficult.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10 patients with WG who underwent reconstruction of saddle nose deformities by the senior author (A.G.) between 2005 and 2009. All patients were reconstructed using costal cartilage grafts.

RESULTS

Primary surgery was functionally and cosmetically successful in 8 of 10 patients. Two patients experienced complications (graft resorption and columellar necrosis) requiring revision surgery; subsequently, they achieved good outcomes, with no further complications. There were no complications at the costal cartilage donor site. At the conclusion of the study, all patients were satisfied with their reconstructions.

CONCLUSIONS

With a multidisciplinary team approach to pre- and postoperative patient management and careful surgical technique, reliable and excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes can be achieved with costal cartilage grafts.

Для цитирования: Sepehr Ali, Alexander Ashlin J, Chauhan Nitin, Gantous Andres. Detailed analysis of graft techniques for nasal reconstruction following Wegener granulomatosis.. Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. 2011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.