DOI 10.1080/00016489.2026.2722603
Geniculate ganglion 'hemangiomas'-venous malformations: from a pathologic to a therapeutic paradigm shift.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Vascular lesions historically named 'geniculate ganglion hemangiomas' (GGH) require clinical and biological re-evaluation.
AIMS/
OBJECTIVES
To challenge the historical nomenclature of 'geniculate ganglion hemangiomas' and to explore the implications of their reclassification as venous malformations (VMs), focusing on function-preserving and minimally invasive strategies.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Retrospective clinical, surgical, and histopathologic reviews of six patients treated for geniculate ganglion vascular lesions at a tertiary referral center. Surgical approaches included endoscopic ear surgery (EES) and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches. Specimens were re-evaluated according to ISSVA criteria.
RESULTS
All patients presented with facial nerve dysfunction and underwent complete surgical excision. Nerve grafting or reanimation procedures were required in four cases. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings in all cases were consistent with slow-flow VMs rather than true hemangiomas.
CONCLUSIONS
These lesions should be reclassified as geniculate ganglion venous malformations (GGVMs) according to ISSVA criteria. Their non-neoplastic nature challenges mandatory radical excision. Minimally invasive EES offers a potential corridor for targeted, function-preserving strategies, though non-resective modalities remain unvalidated in this cohort and require future trial investigation.
SIGNIFICANCE: This shift potentially redefines preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making paradigm. EES offers a minimally invasive corridor, potentially allowing targeted therapies, thereby minimizing facial nerve morbidity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.