DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.04.006
Utility of elastography for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
1) To classify the appearance of thyroid nodules displayed on ultrasound elastography; 2) to explore the sensitivity and specificity of this examination for differentiating benign and malignant nodules, with histopathologic analysis as the reference standard; and 3) to evaluate its utility for avoiding unnecessary procedures.
STUDY
DESIGN
Diagnostic test assessment.
SETTING
Community hospital.
SUBJECTS AND
METHODS
Forty-seven thyroid nodules in 44 consecutive patients were examined with ultrasound elastography. The images we obtained were classified into four patterns. In addition, the mean strain index of the thyroid nodule and that of the sternocleidomastoid muscle were measured, and the nodule-to-muscle strain ratio was calculated. As the reference findings, the presence or absence of calcification, irregular margins, and hypoechogenicity of the thyroid nodules were examined using B-mode ultrasound.
RESULTS
Elastography patterns 3 and 4 were predictive of malignancy, with 73 percent sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39%-94%) and 64 percent specificity (95% CI: 46%-79%). Additionally, all nodules without calcification and those that presented with patterns 1 or 2 were benign. A strain ratio greater than 1.5 was set as the predictor of thyroid malignancy. This criterion showed 90 percent sensitivity (95% CI: 59%-100%) and 50 percent specificity (95% CI: 33%-67%).
CONCLUSION
Although elastography can assist in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, its diagnostic performance is not ideal at present. Further improvements in the technique and the diagnostic criteria are necessary for this examination to provide a useful contribution to diagnosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.