Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
Sacral Insufficiency Fracture Following L4-S1 Circumferential Fusion in Corticosteroid-associated Bone Fragility: A Case Report and Biomechanical Considerations.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barrientos Ratko Yurac, Soria Joaquín Zúñiga, Chadwick Andrea Marré, Toche Nicolás Bifani
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Sacral insufficiency fracture (SIF) is an uncommon but increasingly recognized complication following lumbosacral fusion, particularly in patients with compromised bone quality. The biomechanical vulnerability of the L5-S1 junction, combined with altered load transfer after anterior and posterior reconstruction, may predispose to early sacral failure.
CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old male with lytic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1, repeated corticosteroid exposure, and neurogenic claudication underwent staged circumferential L4-S1 fusion (L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion, L4-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion, and percutaneous posterior fixation). Initial post-operative recovery was satisfactory. At 8 weeks, the patient developed recurrent lumbosciatica. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated collapse of the S1 superior endplate with anterior cage subsidence and foraminal compromise. Revision surgery included bilateral L5-S1 foraminal decompression and posterior refixation. Persistent unilateral radiculopathy required re-exploration, revealing a mobile bone fragment causing dynamic nerve compression, which was resected. The patient subsequently experienced progressive pain relief and returned to functional activity. Radiographs at 8 months confirmed advanced fusion and fracture consolidation.
DISCUSSION: SIF after circumferential fusion may be precipitated by corticosteroid-associated bone fragility, preexisting pars defects, and increased shear forces across the lumbosacral junction. Early symptoms may mimic post-operative radiculopathy, contributing to delayed diagnosis. CT is the most sensitive modality for early detection. Revision strategies include posterior decompression and reinforcement of fixation; in higher-risk cases, pelvic fixation may be warranted.
CONCLUSION: Sacral fracture after lumbosacral fusion requires a high index of suspicion in osteoporotic patients presenting with recurrent radicular pain. Comprehensive biomechanical planning and pre-operative bone density evaluation are essential to mitigate risk.
CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old male with lytic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1, repeated corticosteroid exposure, and neurogenic claudication underwent staged circumferential L4-S1 fusion (L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion, L4-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion, and percutaneous posterior fixation). Initial post-operative recovery was satisfactory. At 8 weeks, the patient developed recurrent lumbosciatica. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated collapse of the S1 superior endplate with anterior cage subsidence and foraminal compromise. Revision surgery included bilateral L5-S1 foraminal decompression and posterior refixation. Persistent unilateral radiculopathy required re-exploration, revealing a mobile bone fragment causing dynamic nerve compression, which was resected. The patient subsequently experienced progressive pain relief and returned to functional activity. Radiographs at 8 months confirmed advanced fusion and fracture consolidation.
DISCUSSION: SIF after circumferential fusion may be precipitated by corticosteroid-associated bone fragility, preexisting pars defects, and increased shear forces across the lumbosacral junction. Early symptoms may mimic post-operative radiculopathy, contributing to delayed diagnosis. CT is the most sensitive modality for early detection. Revision strategies include posterior decompression and reinforcement of fixation; in higher-risk cases, pelvic fixation may be warranted.
CONCLUSION: Sacral fracture after lumbosacral fusion requires a high index of suspicion in osteoporotic patients presenting with recurrent radicular pain. Comprehensive biomechanical planning and pre-operative bone density evaluation are essential to mitigate risk.