MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/acr2.70097

Медицинская библиотека · ACR open rheumatology · 2025

Impact of Concomitant Methotrexate Use and Prior Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Exposure on Tofacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Withdrawal Trial.

Ruperto Nicolino, Lovell Daniel J, Synoverska Olga, Abud-Mendoza Carlos, Spindler Alberto, Vyzhga Yulia, Reyhan Iris, Grebenkina Lyudmila, Tirosh Irit, Imundo Lisa, Chiraseveenuprapund Peter, Kingsbury Daniel J, Sozeri Betul, Vora Sheetal S, Prahalad Sampath, Zholobova Elena, Roberts Kevin D, Sawyerr Gosford, Blum Andreas, Shapiro Andrea, Diehl Annette, Ebrahim Abbas, Klaus Pascal, Martini Alberto, Brunner Hermine I, Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG)

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We evaluate tofacitinib efficacy and safety in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) stratified by concomitant methotrexate and prior biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment.

METHODS

In this two part, double-blind, randomized withdrawal Phase 3 trial (NCT02592434), patients (2-<18 years) with JIA received open-label tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily/weight-based equivalent) in Part 1 (Day 1-Week 18). Those eligible were randomized to continue tofacitinib or switch to placebo in Part 2 (Weeks 18-44). In this post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by concomitant methotrexate (MTX+/-) and prior bDMARD treatment (bDMARD+/-). Efficacy outcomes included JIA disease flare, JIA/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50/70 response rates, and JIA/ACR clinical inactive disease (CID). Safety was assessed throughout the trial.

RESULTS

Of 225 patients in Part 1, 147 (65.3%) were MTX+; 85 (37.8%) were bDMARD+. Across subgroups, JIA flare rate at Week 44 was lower with tofacitinib than placebo: patients who were MTX+ (29.8% vs 47.5%), patients who were MTX- (32.3% vs 73.1%), patients who were bDMARD+ (29.0% vs 70.4%), patients who were bDMARD- (31.6% vs 48.3%). Greater JIA/ACR50/70 and JIA/ACR-CID responses with tofacitinib than with placebo were observed across subgroups. In tofacitinib-treated patients, adverse events (AEs) were more common in the subgroups of patients who were MTX- (85.9%) and patients who were bDMARD+ (81.2%) than the subgroups of patients who were MTX+ (74.1%) and patients who were bDMARD- (76.4%). Similar findings were observed with serious AEs/discontinuations due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib was efficacious for patients regardless of baseline concomitant MTX treatment or prior bDMARD exposure; MTX may have a protective effect for flare upon tofacitinib withdrawal. Safety was consistent with the known tofacitinib profile, and no new risks were identified in these subgroups.

Для цитирования: Ruperto Nicolino, Lovell Daniel J, Synoverska Olga, Abud-Mendoza Carlos, Spindler Alberto, Vyzhga Yulia, Reyhan Iris, Grebenkina Lyudmila, Tirosh Irit, Imundo Lisa, Chiraseveenuprapund Peter, Kingsbury Daniel J, Sozeri Betul, Vora Sheetal S, Prahalad Sampath, Zholobova Elena, Roberts Kevin D, Sawyerr Gosford, Blum Andreas, Shapiro Andrea, Diehl Annette, Ebrahim Abbas, Klaus Pascal, Martini Alberto, Brunner Hermine I, Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG). Impact of Concomitant Methotrexate Use and Prior Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Exposure on Tofacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Withdrawal Trial.. ACR open rheumatology. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.70097.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.