Safety and Efficacy of Interspinous Fixation Device via Lateral Transverse Approach in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that limits function due to reduced space for neurovascular structures. Traditional direct open lumbar decompression (DOLD) is the standard treatment after conservative measures fail. Recently, minimally invasive options such as percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD), interspinous spacers (ISS), and interspinous fixation devices (ISFD) have gained popularity for moderate LSS without spinal instability.
OBJECTIVE
This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ISFD in patients with LSS treated at our center.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Data from 45 patients (26 males, 19 females) treated with ISFD between January 2023 and October 2024 were analyzed. Adverse events and pain outcomes were recorded using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure.
RESULTS
Only one minor complication was reported on the procedure day. procedure day. Mean NRS pain scores improved from 7.5 (baseline) to 3.5 (2 weeks), 3.0 (1 month), and 3.5 (3 months) (P < 0.001). At 2 weeks, 50% of patients had pain reductions ≥51%; at 1 month, 57.4% experienced ≥51% reduction; and by 3 months, 73% had more than 50% pain reduction (P < 0.001), indicating significant pain improvement over time.
LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size and relatively short follow-up time.
CONCLUSION
ISFD appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for LSS. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to compare devices and refine procedural techniques.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.