European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
Deep learning-based lightweight model for automated lumbar foraminal stenosis classification: sagittal CT diagnostic performance compared to clinical subspecialists.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Jia-Wei, Zhang Yu-Long, Li Kai-Yu, Li Hua-Lin, Ye Hao-Bo, Chen Yu-Han, Lin Xin-Xiao, Tian Nai-Feng
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). However, access remains limited in China due to uneven equipment distribution, high costs, and long waiting times. Therefore, this study developed a lightweight deep learning (DL) model using sagittal CT images to classify LFS severity as a potential clinical alternative where MRI is unavailable.
METHODS: A retrospective study included 868 sagittal CT images from 177 patients (2016-2025). Data were split at the patient level into training (n = 125), validation (n = 31), and test sets (n = 21), with annotations, based on the Lee grading system, provided by two spine surgeons. Two DL models were developed: DL1 (EfficientNet-B0) and DL2 (MobileNetV3-Large-100), both of which incorporated a Faster R-CNN with a ResNet-50-based region-of-interest (ROI) detector. Diagnostic performance was benchmarked against spine surgeons with different levels of clinical experience.
RESULTS: DL1 achieved 82.35% diagnostic accuracy (matching the senior spine surgeon's 83.33%), with DL2 at 80.39% (mean 81.37%), both exceeding the junior spine surgeon's 62.75%. DL1 demonstrated near-perfect diagnostic agreement with the senior spine surgeon, as validated by Cohen's kappa analysis (κ = 0.815; 95% CI: 0.723-0.907), whereas DL2 showed substantial consistency (κ = 0.799; 95% CI: 0.703-0.895). Inter-model agreement yielded κ = 0.782 (95% CI: 0.682-0.882).
CONCLUSIONS: The DL models achieved a mean diagnostic accuracy of 81.37%, comparable to that of the senior spine surgeon (83.33%) in grading LFS severity on sagittal CT. However, given the limited sample size and absence of external validation, their applicability and generalisability to other populations and in multi-centre, large-scale datasets remain uncertain.
METHODS: A retrospective study included 868 sagittal CT images from 177 patients (2016-2025). Data were split at the patient level into training (n = 125), validation (n = 31), and test sets (n = 21), with annotations, based on the Lee grading system, provided by two spine surgeons. Two DL models were developed: DL1 (EfficientNet-B0) and DL2 (MobileNetV3-Large-100), both of which incorporated a Faster R-CNN with a ResNet-50-based region-of-interest (ROI) detector. Diagnostic performance was benchmarked against spine surgeons with different levels of clinical experience.
RESULTS: DL1 achieved 82.35% diagnostic accuracy (matching the senior spine surgeon's 83.33%), with DL2 at 80.39% (mean 81.37%), both exceeding the junior spine surgeon's 62.75%. DL1 demonstrated near-perfect diagnostic agreement with the senior spine surgeon, as validated by Cohen's kappa analysis (κ = 0.815; 95% CI: 0.723-0.907), whereas DL2 showed substantial consistency (κ = 0.799; 95% CI: 0.703-0.895). Inter-model agreement yielded κ = 0.782 (95% CI: 0.682-0.882).
CONCLUSIONS: The DL models achieved a mean diagnostic accuracy of 81.37%, comparable to that of the senior spine surgeon (83.33%) in grading LFS severity on sagittal CT. However, given the limited sample size and absence of external validation, their applicability and generalisability to other populations and in multi-centre, large-scale datasets remain uncertain.