MedElevator
Войти в исследования International urogynecology journal · 2023
Gestational diabetes mellitus and pelvic floor function 6 weeks postpartum in Chinese women.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Qing, Wu Xiaotong, Jia Yuanyuan, Zhang Di, Sun Xiuli, Wang Jianliu
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: With the significant increase in its incidence, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has received growing attention for its effect on pelvic floor function. This study was aimed at investigating the association of GDM with pelvic floor function and diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) in postpartum women.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. At 6 weeks postpartum, 1,133 postpartum women with vaginal delivery underwent routine examinations including measurement of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and endurance, determination of the stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by questionnaire, quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and assessment of DRA. Statistical analysis was performed using binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six (176) of the 1,133 women were confirmed to be suffering from GDM, with a rate of 15.53% (176 out of 1,133). The age and pre-pregnancy body mass index of the GDM group were significantly higher than those without GDM (p < 0.05). The GDM group was more likely to have smaller gestational age and a higher chance of having to undergo a lateral episiotomy. No statistically significant differences are found in PFM endurance (B: -0.025, p = 0.462) or PFM strength (B: -0.001, p = 0.979) between women with and without GDM. And these two groups are not significantly different in terms of the prevalence of SUI (19.3% vs 20.4%), POP (35.8% vs 37.5%) and DRA (29.0% vs 25.8%; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle function and SUI/POP/DRA prevalence of women at 6 weeks postpartum are not significantly affected by GDM.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. At 6 weeks postpartum, 1,133 postpartum women with vaginal delivery underwent routine examinations including measurement of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and endurance, determination of the stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by questionnaire, quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and assessment of DRA. Statistical analysis was performed using binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six (176) of the 1,133 women were confirmed to be suffering from GDM, with a rate of 15.53% (176 out of 1,133). The age and pre-pregnancy body mass index of the GDM group were significantly higher than those without GDM (p < 0.05). The GDM group was more likely to have smaller gestational age and a higher chance of having to undergo a lateral episiotomy. No statistically significant differences are found in PFM endurance (B: -0.025, p = 0.462) or PFM strength (B: -0.001, p = 0.979) between women with and without GDM. And these two groups are not significantly different in terms of the prevalence of SUI (19.3% vs 20.4%), POP (35.8% vs 37.5%) and DRA (29.0% vs 25.8%; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic floor muscle function and SUI/POP/DRA prevalence of women at 6 weeks postpartum are not significantly affected by GDM.