DOI 10.1016/j.resinv.2026.101481
Investigation of factors affecting the accuracy of portable monitors in Japanese professional drivers with suspected obstructive sleep apnea.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Portable monitors (PMs) are widely used for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening in Japan. Appropriate interpretation of PM results and decisions regarding subsequent polysomnography (PSG) are essential to avoid underdiagnosis. However, validation studies of PMs in Japanese populations remain limited. We aimed to evaluate discordance between PM and PSG findings and identify factors contributing to this discrepancy.
METHODS
In this single-center retrospective study, 280 professional drivers were screened using type Ⅳ PMs. Participants with a respiratory event index ≥30 events/h or body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 subsequently underwent PSG. Of these, 76.8% had a PSG apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥20 events/h. We assessed the accuracy of the PM-derived 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI) for predicting PSG AHI and assessed factors associated with PM-PSG discordance across BMI categories.
RESULTS
PM and PSG results showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.561, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a PM 3% ODI cutoff of 19.8 events/h for predicting PSG AHI ≥20 events/h (area under the curve = 0.78), with 0.89 sensitivity and 0.60 specificity. A BMI ≥30 kg/m2 was independently associated with PSG AHI ≥20 events/h (odds ratio, 5.33; p = 0.001). Hypopnea-dominant patterns were also associated with PM-PSG discordance.
CONCLUSIONS
Although this study was limited by the high prevalence of OSA in the study population, BMI and hypopnea predominance were important factors for improving the interpretation of PM results. Consideration of these factors may enhance OSA phenotyping in PM-based screening.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.