MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00402-004-0658-5

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2004

Comparison of two methods for the evaluation of treatment in medial epicondylitis: pain estimation vs grip strength measurements.

Rosenberg Nahum, Soudry Michael, Stahl Shalom

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Determination of a precise and reproducible diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients with medial epicondylitis (ME) is important for an effective follow-up. The commonly suggested use of grip strength measurements with a hand dynamometer is not always easily available and may be affected by the patient's compliance. We propose that pain estimation based on the visual analog scale can be considered for this purpose as well because it addresses the painful degenerative lesion in the common flexor origin, which is the basic pathological process in ME.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We analyzed and compared 237 different sets of measurements of grip strengths and pain evaluation, according to the visual analog scale, in 79 patients with ME. For the purpose of this comparison, we developed a qualitative grading system based on the statistical data of the grip strength values in the normal population.

RESULTS

High dependency between the graded pain evaluation and measured grip strength was found.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that evaluation of patients with ME according to the proposed grading method of pain evaluation is as accurate as grip strength measurements.

Для цитирования: Rosenberg Nahum, Soudry Michael, Stahl Shalom. Comparison of two methods for the evaluation of treatment in medial epicondylitis: pain estimation vs grip strength measurements.. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0658-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.