DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.09.003
Progressive halo-vest traction preceding posterior occipitocervical instrumented fusion for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Surgical treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) with basilar invagination (BI) is associated with high rates of severe complications, including mortality. This retrospective study investigated the safety and efficacy of progressive halo-vest traction for IAAD with BI prior to posterior occipitocervical instrumented fusion.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Between 2009 and 2013, 39 patients with IAAD with BI underwent preoperative reduction by progressive halo-vest traction for 20.82±4.21days. Instrumented fusion was then performed through a posterior approach. Clinical outcomes were based on pain scale and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiographic analysis evaluated changes in atlantodental distance, McGregor's line violation, spinal canal width at the craniocervical junction, cervicomedullary angle, C2-C7 lordosis angle, and the occiput-C2 angle.
RESULTS
Follow-ups ranged from 48 to 96 months. Both atlantodental distance and BI significantly improved in all patients. The rates of complete anatomical reduction were 85% for IAAD, and 95% for BI. Most of the patients reported satisfactory pain relief and improvement in daily activity; the mean JOA scores at baseline and last follow-up were 9.10 and 15.92, respectively. Although complications occurred in 10 patients (25.64%), all of which healed uneventfully. The bony fusion rate was 100%.
CONCLUSION
Progressive halo-vest traction before surgery is safe and effective for reduction of IAAD with BI. The technique we describe is a promising method for treatment of complex craniocervical junction deformity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.