Cornea · 2025
Is There a Difference Between Seropositive and Seronegative Sjögren Disease Dry Eye?
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mohamed-Noriega Karim, Riega-Torres Janett, Ramírez-Paura Aldo Noé, Martínez-Delgado José Francisco, Álvarez-González Oscar Eduardo, Velasco-Sepúlveda Braulio H, Morales-Wong Fernando, Garza-Elizondo Mario Alberto, Galarza-Delgado Dionicio Ángel, Mohamed-Hamsho Jesús
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The study aims to compare dry eye disease (DED) prevalence and severity between seropositive and seronegative Sjögren disease (SjD).
METHODS: Prospective, consecutive, comparative cross-sectional cohort study. A total of 160 eyes of 80 patients with SjD by The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism 2016 criteria were included: 55 seropositive and 25 seronegative SjD. Associated SjD was excluded. Patients had dry eye tests performed. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for intereye correlation of the same participant.
RESULTS: Mean age was 52.2 ± 12.7, 96.3% were women, no differences were observed between groups ( P > 0.05). Seronegative SjD had positive minor salivary gland biopsy more often (100% vs. 82%, P = 0.024), but with lower focus score (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.006) than seropositive SjD group. DED prevalence was similar in seropositive and seronegative SjD (92.7% and 84%; P = 0.088). Only noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) average was significantly reduced in seropositive SjD (6.6 ± 3.2 vs. 8.8 ± 2.4, P = 0.011), and the rest of the evaluated DED tests were not significant. In the seropositive group, nonstatistically significant trends toward more severe DED signs, including matrix metalloproteinase-9, osmolarity, Schirmer I without anesthesia, fluorescein tear break-up time, NIBUT first, and Sicca Ocular Staining Score, were observed. Both groups were highly symptomatic in ocular surface disease index score (43 ± 23 vs. 46 ± 30, P = 0.779) and had a reduction in quality of life in National Eye Institute visual health questionnaire-25 test (72 ± 21 vs. 70 ± 24, P = 0.650).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with seropositive SjD showed significantly reduced NIBUT and a trend of more severe DED signs. Patients with seronegative and seropositive SjD were similarly highly symptomatic, experienced important reductions in vision-related quality of life, and had similar DED prevalence.
METHODS: Prospective, consecutive, comparative cross-sectional cohort study. A total of 160 eyes of 80 patients with SjD by The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism 2016 criteria were included: 55 seropositive and 25 seronegative SjD. Associated SjD was excluded. Patients had dry eye tests performed. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for intereye correlation of the same participant.
RESULTS: Mean age was 52.2 ± 12.7, 96.3% were women, no differences were observed between groups ( P > 0.05). Seronegative SjD had positive minor salivary gland biopsy more often (100% vs. 82%, P = 0.024), but with lower focus score (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.006) than seropositive SjD group. DED prevalence was similar in seropositive and seronegative SjD (92.7% and 84%; P = 0.088). Only noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT) average was significantly reduced in seropositive SjD (6.6 ± 3.2 vs. 8.8 ± 2.4, P = 0.011), and the rest of the evaluated DED tests were not significant. In the seropositive group, nonstatistically significant trends toward more severe DED signs, including matrix metalloproteinase-9, osmolarity, Schirmer I without anesthesia, fluorescein tear break-up time, NIBUT first, and Sicca Ocular Staining Score, were observed. Both groups were highly symptomatic in ocular surface disease index score (43 ± 23 vs. 46 ± 30, P = 0.779) and had a reduction in quality of life in National Eye Institute visual health questionnaire-25 test (72 ± 21 vs. 70 ± 24, P = 0.650).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with seropositive SjD showed significantly reduced NIBUT and a trend of more severe DED signs. Patients with seronegative and seropositive SjD were similarly highly symptomatic, experienced important reductions in vision-related quality of life, and had similar DED prevalence.