[The association of posterior tibial slope changes between joint gap contact force and the range of motion in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Objective

To investigate the correlation between the change of posterior tibial slope (PTS) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and the contact force at the end stage of knee flexion and extension, as well as the postoperative range of motion.

Methods

The data of 38 cases (46 knees) of UKAs undertaken in China-Japan Friendship Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were analyzed in this study. A custom-designed force sensor was used to measure gap contact force in the medial gap of UKA. The correlations between each two of the three factors-the change of PTS (∆PTS), the gap contact force of full extension and deep flexion and the range of knee motion were analyzed.

Results

Totally of 38 patients (46 knees) were enrolled, including 14 males and 24 females, aged (69.1±7.4) years, with an average follow-up of (11.2±3.7) months. The average gap contact force was (88.3±40.6)N, the adjusted contact force of the full extension gap was 81.7%±33.8%, while that of the deep flexion gap was 55.6%±31.0%. At the last follow-up, the fixed flexion degree[M(Q1, Q3)] was 0°(0°, 3°), which was significantly lower than the preoperative value of 0°(0°, 5°) (P<0.05); the postoperative max flexion degree was 115.9°±16.4°, it was increased when compared with the preoperative value of 112.0°±16.8° (P<0.05); and the postoperative PTS was 8.3°±2.7°, and there was no significant difference with the preoperative value (8.6°±2.1°,P>0.05). There was a positive correlation between ∆PTS and both the contact force of full extension gap and the fixed flexion degree (r=0.334 and 0.317, P<0.05). Besides, there was a negative correlation between ∆PTS and the contact force of the deep flexion gap (r=-0.397, P<0.05). However, the correlations between these two factors and the max flexion degree were not significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The reduction of PTS in UKA would reduce the contact force of the full extension gap, as well as the postoperative fixed flexion deformity. Besides, it could increase the contact force of the deep flexion gap, but would not influence the max flexion degree of the knee postoperatively.