European journal of orthodontics · 2026
Evaluation of imaging protocols for detecting tooth ankylosis using different CBCT devices: an in vitro study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Özel Şelale, Köse Taha Emre, Şatır Samed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images acquired with different imaging protocols for detecting tooth ankylosis.
METHODS: Thirty extracted permanent teeth (20 single-rooted, 10 three-rooted) were prepared; ankylosis was simulated in 20 by selectively removing Teflon from roots previously coated to mimic the periodontal ligament. Samples were embedded in stone plaster and imaged using 4 protocols on 2 CBCT units. CBCT images were primarily evaluated by a blinded radiologist (present/absent). Micro-CT was performed on 20% of specimens to verify the model. Agreement and accuracy metrics (Fleiss/Cohen κ, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated.
RESULTS: Protocol 2 (0.25 mm voxel) showed the most favorable performance (κ = 0.113; sensitivity 71.4%; PPV 52.6%; NPV 60%). Protocol 3 (0.35 mm voxel) performed worst (κ = -0.104; sensitivity 53.8%; PPV 43.8%; NPV 45.5%). Except for Protocol 3, sensitivity was high (≥71.4%) while specificity remained low (35.7%-42.9%).
LIMITATIONS: The study has its own limits. Different imaging protocols using in clinical practice to detect ankylosis can be investigated as well to provide different approaches assessing ankylosis.
CONCLUSION: CBCT demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for ankylosis detection, indicating a propensity for false positives. Smaller voxel sizes (0.25-0.30 mm) improved detection, whereas 0.35 mm was least reliable.
METHODS: Thirty extracted permanent teeth (20 single-rooted, 10 three-rooted) were prepared; ankylosis was simulated in 20 by selectively removing Teflon from roots previously coated to mimic the periodontal ligament. Samples were embedded in stone plaster and imaged using 4 protocols on 2 CBCT units. CBCT images were primarily evaluated by a blinded radiologist (present/absent). Micro-CT was performed on 20% of specimens to verify the model. Agreement and accuracy metrics (Fleiss/Cohen κ, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were calculated.
RESULTS: Protocol 2 (0.25 mm voxel) showed the most favorable performance (κ = 0.113; sensitivity 71.4%; PPV 52.6%; NPV 60%). Protocol 3 (0.35 mm voxel) performed worst (κ = -0.104; sensitivity 53.8%; PPV 43.8%; NPV 45.5%). Except for Protocol 3, sensitivity was high (≥71.4%) while specificity remained low (35.7%-42.9%).
LIMITATIONS: The study has its own limits. Different imaging protocols using in clinical practice to detect ankylosis can be investigated as well to provide different approaches assessing ankylosis.
CONCLUSION: CBCT demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for ankylosis detection, indicating a propensity for false positives. Smaller voxel sizes (0.25-0.30 mm) improved detection, whereas 0.35 mm was least reliable.