The Journal of arthroplasty · 2026
Trends and Risk Factors in Revision and Rerevision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients From 2016 to 2022.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mittal Ashish, Liu Harry, Lim Perry, Avant-Garde Health Hip Arthroplasty Research Group, Melnic Christopher M, Bedair Hany S, Chen Antonia F, Khanuja Harpal S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of total hip arthroplasty (THA), the burden of revision and rerevision surgeries is anticipated to rise. Revision THA (rTHA) presents challenges because of higher mortality risks and its substantial economic burden on the United States (US) health care system. This study aimed to assess the incidence, diagnoses, and risk factors for both revision and re-rTHA, considering patient- and surgeon-related variables.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 732,544 THAs in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data performed between 2016 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical indications, lengths of stay, discharge statuses, comorbidities, surgeon annual volumes, and years of surgery were collected. The analysis was limited to patients who had two or more years of follow-up after the primary THA. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to estimate revision rates, identify risk factors for failure, and assess first revisions for rerevisions. The Prentice, Williams, and Peterson Gap Time Model was applied to account for multiple events and varying baseline hazards across rerevisions.
RESULTS: The overall revision rate was 3.2%, with a 1-year revision rate of 2.1%. Age ≤ 65, women, White race, preoperative diagnosis of fracture or osteonecrosis, prolonged length of stay, discharge to postacute care facilities, and lower surgeon volume were identified as significant risk factors for revision surgery (P < 0.001). Medical comorbidities most strongly associated with rTHA included malnutrition, dementia, and morbid obesity (P < 0.001). Of the patients undergoing rTHA, 16.5% of patients underwent rerevision. Infection was the diagnosis with the strongest association with rerevision (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into rTHA trends and risk factors in the US Medicare population. Understanding these factors aids in preoperative counseling and enhances planning for improved patient outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 732,544 THAs in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data performed between 2016 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical indications, lengths of stay, discharge statuses, comorbidities, surgeon annual volumes, and years of surgery were collected. The analysis was limited to patients who had two or more years of follow-up after the primary THA. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to estimate revision rates, identify risk factors for failure, and assess first revisions for rerevisions. The Prentice, Williams, and Peterson Gap Time Model was applied to account for multiple events and varying baseline hazards across rerevisions.
RESULTS: The overall revision rate was 3.2%, with a 1-year revision rate of 2.1%. Age ≤ 65, women, White race, preoperative diagnosis of fracture or osteonecrosis, prolonged length of stay, discharge to postacute care facilities, and lower surgeon volume were identified as significant risk factors for revision surgery (P < 0.001). Medical comorbidities most strongly associated with rTHA included malnutrition, dementia, and morbid obesity (P < 0.001). Of the patients undergoing rTHA, 16.5% of patients underwent rerevision. Infection was the diagnosis with the strongest association with rerevision (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into rTHA trends and risk factors in the US Medicare population. Understanding these factors aids in preoperative counseling and enhances planning for improved patient outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.