Yonsei medical journal · 2022
Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yi Tae Im, Lee Eun Chae, Son Nak Hoon, Sohn Min Kyun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Metatarsal pads are prescribed to decrease forefoot plantar pressure. However, the appropriate metatarsal pad placement location remains a debated issue. We aimed to identify the most effective insole design that reduces forefoot plantar pressure and determine the optimal position for metatarsal pad placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 16 healthy adult volunteers, and measured their plantar pressure data during walking while using an in-shoe system. The volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four insole conditions: 1/16-inch insole (i.e., control), 1/4-inch soft plastazote (SP) flat insole, metatarsal pad positioned proximal to the metatarsal head (MTH) on the control insole (P0), and metatarsal pad positioned 10 mm distal from the proximal border of the MTH on the control insole (P10). A masking protocol was created by dividing the forefoot into three subareas, distal to the MTH (dMTH), beneath to the MTH (bMTH), and proximal to the MTH (pMTH). The participants reported their comfort level for each insole using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: The SP flat insole and metatarsal pads both had a forefoot plantar pressure-reducing effect and provided insole comfort. Of the three insole designs, the SP flat insole was the most effective. No clear difference existed in efficacy in terms of the location of the metatarsal pad placement.
CONCLUSION: Considering the possibility of discomfort caused by improper metatarsal pad placement, the SP that increases shock absorption may be more clinically useful.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 16 healthy adult volunteers, and measured their plantar pressure data during walking while using an in-shoe system. The volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four insole conditions: 1/16-inch insole (i.e., control), 1/4-inch soft plastazote (SP) flat insole, metatarsal pad positioned proximal to the metatarsal head (MTH) on the control insole (P0), and metatarsal pad positioned 10 mm distal from the proximal border of the MTH on the control insole (P10). A masking protocol was created by dividing the forefoot into three subareas, distal to the MTH (dMTH), beneath to the MTH (bMTH), and proximal to the MTH (pMTH). The participants reported their comfort level for each insole using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: The SP flat insole and metatarsal pads both had a forefoot plantar pressure-reducing effect and provided insole comfort. Of the three insole designs, the SP flat insole was the most effective. No clear difference existed in efficacy in terms of the location of the metatarsal pad placement.
CONCLUSION: Considering the possibility of discomfort caused by improper metatarsal pad placement, the SP that increases shock absorption may be more clinically useful.