DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.029
Detecting Preperimetric Glaucoma with Standard Automated Perimetry Using a Deep Learning Classifier.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To differentiate the visual fields (VFs) of preperimetric open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients from the VFs of healthy eyes using a deep learning (DL) method.
DESIGN
Cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS
One hundred seventy-one preperimetric glaucoma VFs (PPGVFs) from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 healthy eyes of 87 healthy participants.
METHODS
Preperimetric glaucoma VFs were defined as all VFs before a first diagnosis of manifest glaucoma (Anderson-Patella's criteria). In total, 171 PPGVFs from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 VFs from 108 healthy eyes in 87 healthy participants were analyzed (all VFs were tested using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 program; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). The 52 total deviation, mean deviation, and pattern standard deviation values were used as predictors in the DL classifier: a deep feed-forward neural network (FNN), along with other machine learning (ML) methods, including random forests (RF), gradient boosting, support vector machine, and neural network (NN). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of discrimination for each method.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The AUCs obtained with each classifier method.
RESULTS
A significantly larger AUC of 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8%-95.4%) was obtained using the deep FNN classifier compared with all other ML methods: 79.0% (95% CI, 73.5%-84.5%) with RF, 77.6% (95% CI, 71.7%-83.5%) with gradient boosting, 71.2% (95% CI, 65.0%-77.5%), and 66.7% (95% CI, 60.1%-73.3%) with NN.
CONCLUSIONS
Preperimetric glaucoma VFs can be distinguished from healthy VFs with very high accuracy using a deep FNN classifier.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.