DOI 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23850
SARS-CoV-2 systemic infection in a kidney transplant recipient: sequence analysis in clinical specimens.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess the utility of lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), using high-resolution CT (HRCT) as the reference. Additionally, we explored associations between MRI sequences and common imaging and functional parameters in SSc-ILD evaluation.
METHODS
SSc patients with ILD requiring treatment initiation or change underwent lung assessment at baseline and after 6 months, including MRI (T2-weighted, T1 post-contrast, and T2 star sequences), HRCT, lung ultrasound, and pulmonary function tests. Six-month MRI and HRCT were qualitatively evaluated for improvement, stability, or progression. A follow-up HRCT was performed 2 years after enrolment.
RESULTS
Fourteen SSc-ILD patients (64.3% female, mean age 48.3 years) were enrolled. MRI showed improvement in 1 patient, stability in 9, and progression in 4; in 2 progressed cases, inflammation decreased while fibrotic features increased. T1 contrast sequence significantly correlated with pleural irregularities on ultrasound (ρ=0.55; p=0.04) and DLCO (ρ=-0.65; p=0.01). MRI and HRCT findings at 6 months were concordant in 64.3% of cases, with fair agreement (weighted κ=0.25). MRI outcomes at 6 months matched HRCT findings at 2 years in 92.8% of patients (13/14).
CONCLUSIONS
Lung MRI is a promising adjunctive tool for monitoring SSc-ILD and may provide complementary information to HRCT on early imaging changes, particularly the transition from inflammation to fibrosis. Among MRI sequences, T1 post-contrast best correlated with functional and ultrasound findings, supporting its role in fibrosis assessment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.