MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2026.109836

Медицинская библиотека · Patient education and counseling · 2026

Quality of French-language online information on low back and radicular pain: A systematic evaluation of noncommercial websites.

Homs Alexis F, Le Edouard, Gélis Anthony, Viel Eric, Tavares-Figueiredo Isabelle, Coudeyre Emmanuel, Dupeyron Arnaud F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Low back pain (LBP) and associated radicular leg pain are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions worldwide. Despite clinical guidelines promoting evidence-based management strategies, online health information remains of inconsistent quality, with potential implications for care outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic evaluation of the credibility, information presentation, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of French-language, noncommercial websites providing treatment information on LBP and radicular pain.

METHODS

We conducted in August 2022 systematic Google searches across country-specific domains in France, Belgium, Switzerland, and Canada. We included freely accessible, French-language webpages that provided at least one treatment recommendation for LBP or radicular pain. Commercial webpages and those requiring registration were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed each webpage using the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria for credibility and a modified Netscoring framework, a tool designed to evaluate the quality and presentation of online health information. Treatment recommendations were coded against a synthesis of clinical guidelines to evaluate accuracy and comprehensiveness.

RESULTS

Overall, 88 webpages were included, 41% having been updated since 2020. Comprehensiveness varied widely: only 41% of LBP recommendations and 26% of radicular pain recommendations were addressed. Absolute accuracy of webpage recommendations was 22%, with institutional webpages showing greater accuracy than mainstream sources (28% versus 15%, p < 0.001). Pharmacological therapies were often inappropriately promoted. Concerning credibility, only a small minority of the webpages (19%) disclosed potential conflicts of interest, and 60% presented bibliographic references.

CONCLUSIONS

Most French-language noncommercial websites provide incomplete and frequently inaccurate treatment information on LBP and radicular pain. Institutional websites generally offer better quality content, but significant gaps remain - particularly for radicular pain.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should be aware of the poor quality of online French-language information on LBP and guide patients toward trustworthy resources. Developing validated, user-friendly platforms could help reduce misinformation and support evidence-based self-management.

Для цитирования: Homs Alexis F, Le Edouard, Gélis Anthony, Viel Eric, Tavares-Figueiredo Isabelle, Coudeyre Emmanuel, Dupeyron Arnaud F. Quality of French-language online information on low back and radicular pain: A systematic evaluation of noncommercial websites.. Patient education and counseling. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2026.109836.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.