Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026
Experiences of Rehabilitation Professionals in Guiding Rehabilitation for People with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Qualitative Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ceulemans Dries, Goudman Lisa, Reneman Michiel, Moens Maarten, De Smedt Ann, Godderis Lode, Lavreysen Olivia, Callens Jonas, Van de Velde Vicky, Van de Velde Dominique
Аннотация
PURPOSE: People with chronic low back pain, or more specifically, Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2, experience decreased functionality and quality of life, resulting in a heavy personal and societal burden worldwide. Increasing the capacity of a person to participate in meaningful activities, including return to work, has gained substantial attention, but results remain suboptimal. Gaining more insight into stakeholder experiences is crucial to enhance outcomes. This study aims to investigate the lived experiences of rehabilitation professionals in guiding rehabilitation for people with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 in a research context.
METHODS: An interpretative hermeneutic-phenomenological study was conducted to generate an interpretative understanding of rehabilitation professionals' lived experience in delivering an intervention within a structured research context. Data were collected during semi-structured interviews with 10 rehabilitation professionals. Data analysis followed an interpretative hermeneutic process.
RESULTS: The following experiences were identified: (1) a structured balance between capacity and demand; (2) leaving the current pain-oriented approach; (3) a catalyst for work-oriented reasoning beyond workability; (4) the emerging need for building towards interdisciplinarity; and (5) multiple layers of personalisation.
CONCLUSION: Personalisation is most effective when embedded within a multimodal rehabilitation framework that addresses the physical, psychological, occupational, and contextual domains of functioning. However, it remains a concept that is hard to grasp. Workability-focused protocols may function not only as treatment frameworks but also as catalysts for broader return-to-work reasoning. Although multidisciplinarity is a solid structure, interdisciplinarity is preferred.
METHODS: An interpretative hermeneutic-phenomenological study was conducted to generate an interpretative understanding of rehabilitation professionals' lived experience in delivering an intervention within a structured research context. Data were collected during semi-structured interviews with 10 rehabilitation professionals. Data analysis followed an interpretative hermeneutic process.
RESULTS: The following experiences were identified: (1) a structured balance between capacity and demand; (2) leaving the current pain-oriented approach; (3) a catalyst for work-oriented reasoning beyond workability; (4) the emerging need for building towards interdisciplinarity; and (5) multiple layers of personalisation.
CONCLUSION: Personalisation is most effective when embedded within a multimodal rehabilitation framework that addresses the physical, psychological, occupational, and contextual domains of functioning. However, it remains a concept that is hard to grasp. Workability-focused protocols may function not only as treatment frameworks but also as catalysts for broader return-to-work reasoning. Although multidisciplinarity is a solid structure, interdisciplinarity is preferred.