MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1054/jocn.1999.0170

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2000

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and severe peripheral oedema: a renal explanation.

Henderson R D, Healy H G, McCombe P A, Lander C M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies have been associated with membranous and focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis. Here we describe a 58 year old man with a clinical history, physical examination and laboratory investigations consistent with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), who also had severe lower limb and sacral oedema resistant to medical therapy. Mild proteinuria was present and a renal biopsy showed features consistent with focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis (FSGN). The patient's weakness and oedema did not respond to i.v. immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis but responded to high dose oral prednisone. The oedema was not explained by immobility, hypoproteinaemia or local factors. The occurrence of the oedema in a person with CIDP and FSGN and its improvement with prednisone, together with improvement in CIDP and FSGN, suggests that it was immune mediated, possibly due to increased capillary permeability. The presence of renal disease in patients with inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies may be more common than currently realised.

Для цитирования: Henderson R D, Healy H G, McCombe P A, Lander C M. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and severe peripheral oedema: a renal explanation.. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jocn.1999.0170.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.