m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cureus · 2026

Isolated Lesser Trochanter Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review of Malignant, Infectious, and Benign Etiologies.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Deneroff M, Sack EJ, Khau A, Mohammed Z, Ellaham C, Nichols JW

Аннотация

Isolated lesser trochanter (LT) fractures are uncommon in adults and may be the first clue to an underlying pathologic process. In contrast to adolescent apophyseal avulsions, the same finding in a skeletally mature patient has been linked to metastatic disease, primary bone tumors, hematologic malignancy, infection, and, less often, benign traumatic, stress-related, osteoporotic, or metabolic causes. This review examined the malignant, infectious, and benign etiologies, diagnostic pathways, treatments, and outcomes that have been reported in adults aged 18 years or older presenting with a radiographically isolated LT fracture or avulsion fracture. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for English-language case reports and case series with extractable patient-level data, and one additional eligible report was identified during peer review. Twenty-eight studies involving 46 published patient cases were included. Metastatic solid malignancy was the most commonly reported etiology (27/46, 58.7%), followed by primary malignant bone or plasma-cell tumors (7/46, 15.2%) and benign/nonpathologic causes, including metabolic bone disease (8/46, 17.4%). Hematologic malignancy (2/46, 4.3%), infectious disease (1/46, 2.2%), and other tumor-like disease (1/46, 2.2%) were less common. Among the 36 malignant cases, malignancy was first recognized after the LT fracture in 25 cases (25/36, 69.4%; equivalent to 25/46, 54.3% of all included cases), was known before the fracture in eight, and was unclear or not reported in three cases. These values describe selected published cases and should not be interpreted as population prevalence. Atraumatic, low-energy, or radiographically suspicious adult isolated LT fractures warrant evaluation for underlying malignancy or infection, while metabolic bone disease should remain in the differential diagnosis​​​​​​.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction and background

The lesser trochanter (LT), the insertion site of the iliopsoas tendon, is an unusual site for an isolated fracture in skeletally mature patients. In adolescents, LT avulsion is typically an apophyseal injury related to forceful hip flexion or sports activity. After skeletal maturity, the same radiographic finding carries a different implication. Adult isolated LT fractures are rare, and the evidence base consists mainly of case reports and small case series rather than prospective studies or standardized treatment pathways [ 1 ]. This case-based literature is highly susceptible to publication and selection bias and cannot establish the true frequency of malignancy or other etiologies among unselected adults.

In adults, the concern is that a small avulsed LT fragment may be the first finding that brings an occult lesion to attention, and the published adult literature spans malignant, infectious, benign traumatic, stress-related, osteoporotic, and metabolic diagnoses [ 2 - 29 ]. A radiology teaching-file review from a specialist orthopedic oncology center found LT avulsion in 15 of 295 aggressive proximal femoral tumors, underscoring how subtle the sign can be; metastatic disease was most common, but myeloma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and giant cell tumor were also represented [ 29 ]. In the case literature, patients commonly present with hip or groin pain after no trauma or a low-energy event. The initial radiograph may show only an apparently isolated fragment, while CT, MRI, bone scan, PET/CT, or biopsy later reveals proximal femoral tumor infiltration. Reported malignant causes include metastatic carcinoma from lung, breast, colon, renal, nasopharyngeal, bronchogenic, and other primary sites, as well as primary malignant bone tumors, plasma-cell neoplasms, hematologic malignancy, and tumor-like disorders [ 2 , 3 , 6 - 9 , 11 - 17 , 20 - 23 , 25 - 27 , 29 ].

That pattern does not mean every adult LT fracture is malignant. Published cases also include tuberculosis, stress-related injury, low-energy osteoporotic fractures in elderly patients, nonpathologic traumatic injuries, and renal osteodystrophy associated with end-stage renal disease [ 4 , 5 , 10 , 18 , 19 , 24 , 28 ]. Papineni et al. reported a 31-year-old adult with a radiographically isolated left LT avulsion fracture after minor trauma in the setting of renal osteodystrophy and secondary hyperparathyroidism [ 28 ]. Although bilateral olecranon avulsion fractures occurred concurrently, the LT fracture itself had no reported intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, femoral neck, or shaft extension and therefore met the anatomical inclusion definition. For orthopedic surgeons, radiologists, and oncologists, the differential includes metastatic disease, primary bone tumor, infection, metabolic bone disease, benign avulsion, occult intertrochanteric extension, and mechanical instability.

The workup is part of the treatment decision, not a separate issue. Plain radiographs can identify the LT fragment, but they may miss marrow replacement, cortical destruction, soft-tissue extension, or the true length of proximal femoral involvement. This limitation matters when hip or groin pain is evaluated with a single anteroposterior pelvis or hip radiograph; the fragment may be easier to see than the underlying lesion. For adult atraumatic LT avulsion, MRI of the hip, plasma electrophoresis, and staging studies have been recommended to evaluate for primary or metastatic bone disease [ 29 ]. In practice, advanced imaging can define the lesion, guide biopsy, evaluate systemic disease, and help determine whether prophylactic stabilization or reconstruction is needed. When imaging suggests tumor infiltration or infection, tissue diagnosis is often the step that separates observation or protected weight bearing from biopsy, oncologic therapy, radiation, intramedullary fixation, dynamic hip screw fixation, resection, arthroplasty, or endoprosthetic reconstruction [ 1 - 3 , 14 , 18 , 21 , 29 ].

To be clinically useful, a synthesis of this literature must do more than report how often malignancy appears in published cases. The primary review question was: among adults aged 18 years or older with a radiographically isolated LT fracture or avulsion fracture, what malignant, infectious, and benign etiologies, diagnostic pathways, treatments, and outcomes have been reported? The review therefore mapped the etiologic spectrum, described the diagnostic pathways reported in published cases, identified how often malignancy was recognized before or after the fracture, and connected diagnosis with treatment and structural risk.

Review

Methods

Search Strategy and Study Selection

This descriptive systematic review was reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance [ 30 ]. A structured search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from May 1, 2026, through July 15, 2026, with the final search in each database completed on July 15, 2026. Searches used database-specific combinations of terms for the LT and fracture or avulsion, and raw record counts were documented before duplicate removal. The search was limited to English-language full-text reports because translation resources were unavailable; the potential for language bias was considered when interpreting the findings. The combined search yielded 204 records: PubMed (n = 127), Embase (n = 32), and Scopus (n = 45). Complete database-specific search strategies are provided in Table 1 . The review protocol was not prospectively registered. Eligibility criteria, extraction variables, etiologic categories, and the narrative synthesis plan were established before study screening and data extraction. The PRISMA flow diagram was generated using the PRISMA2020 R package and Shiny application (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [ 31 ].

Table 1
Database-specific search strategies and identified records The combined search identified 204 records before deduplication: PubMed (n = 127), Embase (n = 32), and Scopus (n = 45). LT: Lesser trochanter.

DatabaseSearch strategyLimits/screening ruleRecords identified
PubMed("lesser trochanter"[Title/Abstract] OR "lesser trochanteric"[Title/Abstract] OR "trochanter minor"[Title/Abstract]) AND (fracture*[Title/Abstract] OR avulsion*[Title/Abstract] OR "pathologic fracture"[Title/Abstract] OR "pathological fracture"[Title/Abstract] OR "Femoral Fractures"[Mesh] OR "Avulsion Fractures"[Mesh])English; humans; adult eligibility applied during screening127
Embase('lesser trochanter':ti,ab,kw OR 'lesser trochanteric':ti,ab,kw OR 'trochanter minor':ti,ab,kw) AND (fracture*:ti,ab,kw OR avulsion*:ti,ab,kw OR 'pathologic fracture':ti,ab,kw OR 'pathological fracture':ti,ab,kw OR 'femur fracture'/exp OR 'avulsion fracture'/exp OR 'pathologic fracture'/exp)Humans; English; adult eligibility applied during screening32
ScopusTITLE-ABS-KEY(("lesser trochanter" OR "lesser trochanteric" OR "trochanter minor") AND (fracture* OR avulsion* OR "pathologic fracture" OR "pathological fracture"))English; adult eligibility applied during screening45
TotalPubMed + Embase + ScopusTotal records before deduplication204

All retrieved citations were imported into Zotero (Corporation for Digital Scholarship, Vienna, VA) for citation management and deduplication. Potential duplicates were identified electronically and then manually verified by comparing titles, authors, publication years, and available DOI or PMID information. After removal of 151 duplicate records, 53 unique records remained. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers, followed by independent full-text review of potentially eligible reports. Disagreements regarding eligibility were resolved through discussion and consensus. As every unique record contained potentially relevant LT fracture terminology, no record was excluded at the title/abstract stage, and all 53 reports advanced to full-text assessment; this accounts for the zero title/abstract exclusions shown in Figure 1 .

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram Flow of records through the systematic review process. Database searches included PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. One additional eligible report was ident…
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram Flow of records through the systematic review process. Database searches included PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. One additional eligible report was identified during peer review and assessed under the same prespecified criteria. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Both reviewers also examined the reference lists of all included studies and relevant review-style publications and performed forward citation searching. Supplementary citation searching was completed on July 15, 2026, and identified no additional eligible original cases. During peer review, one potentially eligible report was identified through other methods, assessed against the same prespecified eligibility criteria, and included in the final review.

Studies were eligible if they reported adults aged 18 years or older with an isolated LT fracture or avulsion fracture and included extractable patient-level data. An isolated fracture was operationally defined as a discrete fracture fragment arising from the LT without reported intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, femoral neck, femoral shaft, periprosthetic, or multifragmentary proximal femoral extension on the available radiographs or cross-sectional imaging. Concomitant fractures outside the proximal femur did not preclude inclusion when the LT fracture itself met this anatomical definition. CT or MRI findings were used to exclude occult extension when those studies were reported; later progression to a larger proximal femoral fracture did not negate eligibility if the initial presentation was isolated. Each included case had sufficient information to establish adult status, the isolated fracture pattern, and a final etiology, together with at least one extractable variable related to presentation, diagnostic evaluation, management, or outcome. Missing fields were recorded as not reported. Review articles, teaching-file reviews, and aggregate imaging summaries were used for reference-list checking and contextual discussion only unless they contributed original or clearly new cases. To identify overlapping cases and prevent double-counting, reports were compared by author group, institution, publication period, patient age and sex, tumor type, and clinical chronology; the most complete primary report was retained, and previously published cases repeated in review-style articles were not re-extracted. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 2 .

Table 2
Inclusion and exclusion criteria LT: Lesser trochanter.

Criterion typeCriterion
InclusionPatient aged 18 years or older
Radiographically isolated lesser trochanter fracture or avulsion fracture
Concomitant fractures outside the proximal femur permitted when the lesser trochanter fracture itself met the radiographic isolation definition
Case report, case series, or observational report
Extractable patient-level data establishing final etiology plus at least one variable on presentation, diagnostic evaluation, management, or outcome
English-language full-text report
ExclusionPatient younger than 18 years
Adolescent athletic apophyseal avulsion injury
Intertrochanteric fracture with lesser trochanter involvement
Subtrochanteric fracture with lesser trochanter involvement
Femoral neck fracture with lesser trochanter involvement
Femoral shaft fracture with lesser trochanter involvement
Periprosthetic fracture
Multifragmentary proximal femur fracture in which the lesser trochanter was not the primary isolated fracture finding
Biomechanical study without patient-level clinical data
Abstract-only report
Report without adequate patient-level details
Non-English report
Review article, teaching-file review, or aggregate imaging summary without original extractable cases

Data Extraction and Quality Appraisal

Extracted variables included author/year, patient age and sex, mechanism or trigger, presenting symptoms, fracture site/laterality, etiology group, final diagnosis or primary tumor, whether malignancy was known before the LT fracture, imaging/workup, LT/proximal femoral lesion tissue diagnosis or pathology confirmation, treatment, and outcome/follow-up. Two reviewers independently performed patient-level data extraction and quality appraisal, with disagreements resolved through discussion and consensus. The 22 case reports were appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports, while the six case series were evaluated with the dedicated JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series, as described in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [ 32 ]. Appraisal findings were used to judge completeness, selection bias, and confidence in interpretation; studies were not excluded solely based on appraisal results (Table 3 ).

Table 3
JBI critical appraisal summary by study design Case-report domains: Q1 demographics; Q2 history/timeline; Q3 clinical condition; Q4 diagnostic methods/results; Q5 intervention; Q6 post-intervention condition; Q7 adverse events/harms; Q8 takeaway lessons. Case-series domains: Q1 clear inclusion criteria; Q2 condition measured in a standard/reliable way; Q3 valid identification methods; Q4 consecutive inclusion; Q5 complete inclusion; Q6 demographics; Q7 clinical information; Q8 outcomes/follow-up; Q9 reporting of site/demographic characteristics; Q10 appropriate statistical analysis. CR: Case report; CS: Case series; Y: Yes; N: No; U: Unclear; NA: Not applicable; JBI: Joanna Briggs Institute.

Studies (design)Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ] (CS)YYYUUYYNYY
Herren et al., 2015 [ 2 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Afra et al., 1999 [ 3 ] (CS)YYYUUYYYYNA
Miyake et al., 2022 [ 4 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Agrawal et al., 2023 [ 5 ] (CR)YYYYYYYYNANA
Yu et al., 2024 [ 6 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Creissen et al., 2020 [ 7 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Kumar et al., 2017 [ 8 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Pang et al., 2025 [ 9 ] (CR)YYYYYYYYNANA
Sharma et al., 2022 [ 10 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Vanhoenacker et al., 2021 [ 11 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Uddin et al., 2016 [ 12 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Rouvillain et al., 2011 [ 13 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Khoury et al., 1998 [ 14 ] (CS)UYYUUYYNYNA
Fox et al., 2014 [ 15 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
McCambridge et al., 2023 [ 16 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Edmonds et al., 2003 [ 17 ] (CR)YYYYNNNYNANA
Bonshahi et al., 2004 [ 18 ] (CS)YYYUUYYYYNA
Singh et al., 2015 [ 19 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Bertin et al., 1984 [ 20 ] (CS)YYYUUYYYYNA
Heiney and Leeson, 2009 [ 21 ] (CR)YYYYYYYYNANA
Reategui-Villegas et al., 2013 [ 22 ] (CR)YYYYYYYYNANA
Phan and Vu, 2018 [ 23 ] (CR)YYYYYNNYNANA
Uzun et al., 2016 [ 24 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Koçer et al., 2021 [ 25 ] (CR)YYYYYYNYNANA
Phillips et al., 1988 [ 26 ] (CS)YYYUUYYNYNA
Gradwohl and Mailliard, 1987 [ 27 ] (CR)YYYYNNNYNANA
Papineni et al., 2025 [ 28 ] (CR)YYYYYNNYNANA

The etiologic groups (metastatic solid malignancy, primary malignant bone or plasma-cell tumor, hematologic malignancy, infectious disease, other neoplastic/tumor-like disease, and benign/nonpathologic cause) and the narrative synthesis methods were defined before data extraction. Meta-analysis was not performed because the evidence base consisted predominantly of case reports and small case series with heterogeneous clinical reporting. Results are presented descriptively using patient-level counts and clearly stated denominators. Details not explicitly reported were coded as not reported and were not assumed to be absent. Percentages represent reporting frequencies in selected published cases and were not interpreted as prevalence, diagnostic accuracy, comparative effectiveness, or recommended test utilization.

Results

Study Selection and Patient Characteristics

Twenty-eight English-language studies met inclusion criteria and contributed 46 original patient cases. The evidence base comprised 22 case reports and six case series; no comparative or prospective observational studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven studies were identified from the database and citation-search workflow, and one additional eligible case report was identified during peer review and assessed using the same prespecified criteria. All included cases provided extractable adult and isolated-fracture status, a final etiology, and at least one patient-level variable related to presentation, diagnostic evaluation, management, or outcome. Table 4 summarizes the patient-level characteristics and outcomes, and Figure 1 shows the study selection process.

Table 4
Patient-level characteristics and outcomes of adult isolated lesser trochanter fractures Each row represents one extracted patient/case. Review-style articles contributed only original/new cases; prior literature-review cases were not re-extracted. The Papineni et al. [ 28 ] case was added during peer review and met the anatomical definition because the LT fracture itself was isolated within the proximal femur despite concomitant olecranon fractures. LT: Lesser trochanter; NR: Not reported; MUTARS: Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System; US: Ultrasound; IM: Intramedullary; ORIF: Open reduction and internal fixation; SFA: Superficial femoral artery; ABI: Ankle-brachial index; MRA; Magnetic resonance angiography; CTA: Computed tomography angiography; NSCLC: Non-small cell lung cancer; CECT: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography; ATT: Anti-tuberculosis treatment; PSA: Prostate-specific antigen; LCH: Langerhans cell histiocytosis; FDG: Fluorodeoxyglucose; DHS: Dynamic hip screw; SLR: Straight leg raise; NWB: Non-weight-bearing; GI: Gastrointestinal; TFN-A: Trochanteric fixation nail-advanced; PTH: Parathyroid hormone.

Study/reportAge/sexMechanism/presentationEtiology groupFinal diagnosisDiagnostic workupManagement/outcome
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 1: 57/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip. Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyHepatocellular carcinomaRadiographs; MRI; CT-guided core needle biopsyManagement: Tumor prosthesis/MUTARS. Outcome: NR
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 2: 68/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip. Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyThyroid cancerRadiographs; MRIManagement: Tumor prosthesis/MUTARS. Outcome: NR
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 3: 56/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip. Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyRenal cell carcinomaRadiographs; MRI; CT-guided core needle biopsyManagement: Tumor prosthesis/MUTARS. Outcome: NR
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 4: 72/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyProstate cancerRadiographs; MRIManagement: Radiation therapy. Outcome: NR
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 5: 62/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip. Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyRenal cell carcinomaRadiographs; MRIManagement: Tumor prosthesis/MUTARS. Outcome: NR
Cho et al., 2020 [ 1 ]Original case 6: 62/MIndividual mechanism NR; overall current series 5 no trauma/1 slip. Presentation: Groin pain/antalgic gaitPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorOsteosarcomaRadiographs; MRIManagement: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Outcome: NR
Herren et al., 2015 [ 2 ]61/FChiropractor treatment/minor manipulation. Presentation: Right groin pain, low back pain, weight loss, night sweatsMetastatic solid malignancyPoorly differentiated breast carcinoma with liver/skeletal metastasesX-ray; CT pelvis; breast US/mammography; CT stagingManagement: Conservative ortho care; palliative paclitaxel/bevacizumab; refused IM nail. Outcome: No complaints/no mobility limitation at 5 months
Afra et al., 1999 [ 3 ]Case 1: 44/MNo antecedent trauma; acute worsening while sailing. Presentation: Left hip/groin pain; hip flexion weaknessPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorSolitary plasmacytomaRadiographs; CT; technetium bone scan; skeletal surveyManagement: Zickel nail + methylmethacrylate; postoperative irradiation. Outcome: Asymptomatic; reconstruction intact; no recurrence or progression to multiple myeloma at latest follow-up
Afra et al., 1999 [ 3 ]Case 2: 69/MNo trauma; avulsion while exiting automobile. Presentation: Left groin pain, increasing pain/difficulty lifting limbPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorChondrosarcomaRadiographs; MRI; bone scan; CT chestManagement: ORIF initially; wide en bloc proximal femur resection and custom proximal femoral endoprosthesis. Outcome: Local recurrence and pulmonary metastasis; died May 1991 after massive stroke with pulmonary metastases at death
Afra et al., 1999 [ 3 ]Case 3: 19/MNo specific trauma; crack stepping onto curb. Presentation: Right groin pain; massive swelling of thigh/buttockPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorEwing sarcomaRadiographs; CTManagement: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiation; wide resection and custom proximal femoral component. Outcome: Widespread osseous/pulmonary metastases within 2 months; died 6 months later
Afra et al., 1999 [ 3 ]Case 4: 36/MNo trauma stated; chronic back/radicular history with new groin pain. Presentation: Left groin pain and weak hip flexionPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorHigh-grade chondrosarcomaRadiographs; MRIManagement: Wide resection and allograft-prosthesis composite; later resection of metastatic nodules. Outcome: No additional local recurrence or metastatic disease for 2 years at latest follow-up
Miyake et al., 2022 [ 4 ]40/MBaseball pitching stress; stumble getting into car. Presentation: Gradual left hip pain with acute worseningBenign/nonpathologicStress avulsion fractureRadiographs; MRI; CT; gadolinium MRI; technetium scintigraphyManagement: Conservative. Outcome: Returned to sports 12 weeks; asymptomatic/full ROM at 1 year despite nonunion
Agrawal et al., 2023 [ 5 ]19/MHockey injury with nondisplaced LT avulsion. Presentation: Intermittent claudication, calf cramping, medial knee numbnessBenign/nonpathologicAdductor canal syndrome/SFA occlusion after LT avulsionX-ray; duplex; ABI; MRA; angiogram; CTAManagement: SFA interposition bypass; later thrombolysis/angioplasty; aspirin/rivaroxaban. Outcome: Pain-free/without claudication at 4 months; not yet returned to hockey
Yu et al., 2024 [ 6 ]71/MNo reported trauma. Presentation: Progressive left hip/thigh pain, difficulty weight bearing, weight lossMetastatic solid malignancyMetastatic paragangliomaX-ray; MRI; labs; CT-guided biopsy; DOTATATE PET/CTManagement: Doxazosin; external beam radiation 3000 cGy/10 fractions. Outcome: Intermittent weight-bearing pain after RT; normetanephrine decreased at 3 months
Creissen et al., 2020 [ 7 ]66/FAtraumatic/popping sensation while sitting. Presentation: Right medial thigh/groin pain, bruising, antalgic gaitMetastatic solid malignancyNSCLC lung carcinomaX-ray; MRI; CT neck/chest/abdomen/pelvisManagement: Analgesia/non-weight bearing; afatinib palliative chemotherapy. Outcome: Good response with reduced tumor bulk at publication
Kumar et al., 2017 [ 8 ]60/FAtraumatic; getting out of bed. Presentation: Left hip pain with weight-bearingMetastatic solid malignancyPrimary lung carcinoma with widespread metastasisX-ray; MRI; CECT chest/abdomen; PET; proximal femur core needle biopsyManagement: Proximal femoral nail; chemoradiation/supportive care. Outcome: At home under supportive care at publication
Pang et al., 2025 [ 9 ]79/MMinor trauma/hip loading while bicycling. Presentation: Left hip pain and limited mobility; persistent pain after bed restMetastatic solid malignancyPoorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of lungX-ray; CT; MRI; contrast MRI; CT chest/abdomen; bone scanManagement: Initial bed rest; palliative radiotherapy; carboplatin/paclitaxel/tislelizumab. Outcome: Died of severe pulmonary infection
Sharma et al., 2022 [ 10 ]40/MAtraumatic; while climbing stairs. Presentation: Right groin pain, inability to bear weightInfectiousMycobacterium tuberculosisX-ray; MRI; CT-guided biopsy; GeneXpert/culturesManagement: 4-drug ATT; staged weight-bearing/activity modification. Outcome: No pain/limitations at 2 years; displaced fragment persisted
Vanhoenacker et al., 2021 [ 11 ]18/NRNo clear trauma; cyclist. Presentation: Months of left groin pain; night painPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorEwing sarcomaCT; MRI; follow-up radiograph; repeat MRIManagement: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; resection; femoral prosthesis. Outcome: Uneventful follow-up
Uddin et al., 2016 [ 12 ]48/FAtraumatic/trivial movement getting into car. Presentation: Acute right hip pain; painful hip flexionMetastatic solid malignancyUndifferentiated bronchial adenocarcinomaRadiographs; chest x-ray; CT chest/abdomen; MRI hip; MRI brain; bone scan; bronchoscopic biopsy; intraoperative femur biopsyManagement: Prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing; chemotherapy. Outcome: Transferred to oncology; longer outcome NR
Rouvillain et al., 2011 [ 13 ]63/MAtraumatic. Presentation: Thigh-root pain, limp, worsening functionMetastatic solid malignancyMucosecreting metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomaX-ray; MRI; CT; PETManagement: En-bloc resection/reconstruction with megaprosthesis; cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy; T3 vertebral cementoplasty/radiation. Outcome: At 9 months, walking without cane/limp; normal pain-free hip mobility; PMA 18/18
Khoury et al., 1998 [ 14 ]Case 1: 65/FNon-traumatic. Presentation: LT avulsion due to neoplasmMetastatic solid malignancyBreast cancer metastasisDetails not extractable from available PDFManagement: Palliative radiation. Outcome: NR
Khoury et al., 1998 [ 14 ]Case 2: 37/MNon-traumatic. Presentation: LT avulsion due to neoplasmMetastatic solid malignancySynovial sarcomaDetails not extractable from available PDFManagement: Prophylactic fixation. Outcome: NR
Khoury et al., 1998 [ 14 ]Case 3: 49/MNon-traumatic. Presentation: LT avulsion due to neoplasmPrimary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumorOsteosarcomaDetails not extractable from available PDFManagement: Prophylactic fixation. Outcome: NR
Fox et al., 2014 [ 15 ]75/MVery low-impact fall while sitting. Presentation: Left groin pain and difficulty in weight-bearingMetastatic solid malignancyRenal cell carcinoma suspected/large renal mass with bony metastasisRadiographs; CT hip/pelvis; CT abdomen/pelvis; chest x-ray; PSAManagement: Prophylactic IM nail; palliative chemotherapy/treatment. Outcome: Stable disease; discharged with palliative care
McCambridge et al., 2023 [ 16 ]18/MPain after kicking punching bag; recurrence after baseball swing. Presentation: Right hip pain, night pain, lytic LT lesionOther neoplastic/tumor-likeMultifocal single-system LCH of boneRadiographs; MRI; bone scan; CT chest; FDG-PET/CT; brain imagingManagement: Prophylactic IM nail; curettage/cryoablation; vinblastine/prednisone. Outcome: Lesions improved after 3 months; chemotherapy stopped; continued oncology follow-up planned every 6-12 months for 5 years
Edmonds et al., 2003 [ 17 ]63/FNo trauma. Presentation: Progressive right upper thigh painMetastatic solid malignancyMetastatic colon adenocarcinomaRadiograph; CT; MRI; chest CTManagement: NR. Outcome: NR
Bonshahi et al., 2004 [ 18 ]Case 1: 90/FFall backward twisting left leg. Presentation: Unable to mobilize due to painBenign/nonpathologicOsteoporotic traumatic LT fracture; no tumor on postmortemX-rayManagement: Initial nonoperative; later DHS after intertrochanteric fracture. Outcome: Died postoperatively of bronchopneumonia/chest complications
Bonshahi et al., 2004 [ 18 ]Case 2: 79/FFall backward from stool. Presentation: Unable to bear weight due to painBenign/nonpathologicOsteoporotic traumatic LT fractureX-rayManagement: Initially full weight-bearing with Zimmer frame; later DHS after intertrochanteric fracture. Outcome: Uneventful postoperative recovery
Bonshahi et al., 2004 [ 18 ]Case 3: 84/FSlipped on kitchen floor and fell backward. Presentation: Failed mobility assessment; displaced isolated LT fractureBenign/nonpathologicOsteoporotic traumatic LT fractureX-rayManagement: Prophylactic DHS before mobilization. Outcome: Bearing weight with assistance at discharge to rehab day 6
Singh et al., 2015 [ 19 ]40/FRoad traffic accident/dashboard-like injury. Presentation: Severe right groin pain, thigh swelling, unable to perform SLRBenign/nonpathologicNonpathologic displaced LT avulsionX-ray; skeletal survey; labs; serial x-raysManagement: Derotation boot/bar brace/cast; partial weight-bearing. Outcome: Symptom-free by 6 weeks; no pathology on serial radiographs
Bertin et al., 1984 [ 20 ]Case 1: 28/MPutting on trousers. Presentation: Left groin painMetastatic solid malignancyPancreatic islet-cell carcinoma metastasisRadiograph; bone scan; arteriogram; rib biopsy; GI series; pancreas biopsyManagement: Initial crutches/NWB; radiation/chemotherapy for metastases; later sliding nail after subtrochanteric fracture. Outcome: Subtrochanteric fracture nearly healed after fixation; died Jan 1978 after prolonged hospital course and multiple abdominal surgeries
Bertin et al., 1984 [ 20 ]Case 2: 52/FNo trauma; starting up stairs. Presentation: Right groin painMetastatic solid malignancyMetastatic follicular thyroid carcinomaRadiograph; bone scan; tomogramsManagement: Thyroidectomy + prophylactic sliding nail; radioactive iodine; later radiation; local resection/prosthetic replacement. Outcome: No subtrochanteric fracture before replacement; increasing pain/enlarging lesion at 2 years
Bertin et al., 1984 [ 20 ]Case 3: NR/NRSlight/no trauma. Presentation: Hip/groin painMetastatic solid malignancyProstate cancer metastasisNRManagement: Initial conservative care; later ORIF after subtrochanteric fracture. Outcome: NR
Bertin et al., 1984 [ 20 ]Case 4: NR/NRSlight/no trauma. Presentation: Hip/groin painMetastatic solid malignancyAdenocarcinoma of unknown origin metastasisNRManagement: Initial conservative care; later ORIF after subtrochanteric fracture. Outcome: NR
Heiney and Leeson, 2009 [ 21 ]Late 40s/FTwisting/slight slip in kitchen; no fall. Presentation: Right hip/groin pain, inability to ambulateHematologic malignancyRecurrent acute myeloid leukemiaRadiograph; CT; bone scan; MRIManagement: Prophylactic IM reconstruction nail; oncology care; palliative radiation. Outcome: Pain-free ambulation 4 months; hospice; died 4 months after surgery
Reategui-Villegas et al., 2013 [ 22 ]69/MNo trauma. Presentation: Right hip pain, worse at night, 2 monthsMetastatic solid malignancyNon-small cell lung carcinomaHip x-ray; chest x-ray; bronchoscopy; tumor markers; bone scintigraphy; CTManagement: Prophylactic IM nail and chemo planned but not performed. Outcome: Died of respiratory failure 19 days after hospitalization
Phan and Vu, 2018 [ 23 ]58/MFall onto buttocks. Presentation: Acute right hip pain and low back painMetastatic solid malignancyNasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis; nondifferentiated carcinomaPelvic x-ray; CT; MRIManagement: Refused further treatment; discharged. Outcome: NR
Uzun et al., 2016 [ 24 ]86/MLeg stuck at door; staggered, no fall. Presentation: Right hip pain and difficulty walkingBenign/nonpathologicDisplaced LT fracture without malignancyRadiograph; CT; labsManagement: Cable and plate fixation. Outcome: Painless hip mobility/no walking difficulty at 3 months
Koçer et al., 2021 [ 25 ]55/MAtraumatic; standing from bus seat. Presentation: Right hip pain/limp; later dyspnea/chest painMetastatic solid malignancyMetastatic left perihilar bronchial carcinomaX-ray; CT pelvis; chest CT; bronchoscopy; PETManagement: Initial conservative care; later TFN-A osteosynthesis/cementoplasty followed by radiotherapy. Outcome: No pain and walking without assistance; PET showed no recurrence by Oct 2020
Phillips et al., 1988 [ 26 ]Case 1: 55/MNo significant trauma. Presentation: Right hip painMetastatic solid malignancyColon adenocarcinomaRadiograph; specimen radiograph/autopsy confirmation noted in figuresManagement: NR. Outcome: NR
Phillips et al., 1988 [ 26 ]Case 2: 38/MNo significant trauma. Presentation: Right hip and groin pain; chest x-ray - large massMetastatic solid malignancyLarge-cell carcinomaRadiograph; CT; radionuclide bone scan; chest X-rayManagement: NR. Outcome: NR
Phillips et al., 1988 [ 26 ]Case 3: 64/MNo significant trauma. Presentation: Left hip painMetastatic solid malignancyProstate adenocarcinomaRadiographManagement: NR. Outcome: NR
Phillips et al., 1988 [ 26 ]Case 4: 51/MNo significant trauma. Presentation: Right hip and upper leg painHematologic malignancyNon-Hodgkin lymphomaRadiograph; MRIManagement: NR. Outcome: NR
Gradwohl and Mailliard, 1987 [ 27 ]61/MSevere cough after aspiration while drinking wine. Presentation: Sudden knife-like right groin painMetastatic solid malignancyHistory of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; bone scan suspicious for right rib and right mid-femur metastasesX-ray; bone scan; prior CT/bone scan surveillanceManagement: Orthopedic management NR. Outcome: NR after LT fracture
Papineni et al., 2025 [ 28 ]31/MMinor motorcycle accident (~10 km/h fall onto left side). Presentation: Left hip pain/tenderness with flexion and rotation; concurrent bilateral olecranon avulsion fracturesBenign/nonpathologicRenal osteodystrophy with secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease; left iliopsoas/LT avulsionPelvis radiographs; CT pelvis; MRI hip; laboratory assessment including calcium, phosphate, PTH, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine/eGFRManagement: LT fracture treated conservatively; left olecranon surgically repaired. Outcome: LT-specific follow-up NR

Etiologic Distribution

Table 5 and Figure 2 show the etiologic distribution. Metastatic solid malignancy made up the largest group, accounting for 27 of 46 cases (58.7%). Primary malignant bone or plasma-cell tumors accounted for seven cases (15.2%), and benign/nonpathologic etiologies, including renal osteodystrophy, accounted for eight cases (17.4%). Hematologic malignancy was reported in two cases (4.3%), while infectious disease and other neoplastic/tumor-like disease each accounted for one case (2.2%).

Table 5
Etiologic distribution of adult isolated lesser trochanter fracture cases Studies and patient counts are based on extracted original/new cases only. Individual studies may contribute cases to more than one etiologic group; therefore, study counts across categories are not mutually exclusive and do not sum to 28.

Etiology groupStudies with cases (n)Patient cases (n)% of patient casesRepresentative diagnoses
Metastatic solid malignancy172758.7%Lung, renal cell, breast, colon, thyroid, prostate, paraganglioma, esophageal, pancreatic/islet cells
Primary malignant bone/plasma-cell tumor4715.2%Osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, solitary plasmacytoma
Benign/nonpathologic6817.4%Stress/repetitive-use, traumatic/athletic, osteoporotic/elderly, renal osteodystrophy/secondary hyperparathyroidism
Hematologic malignancy224.3%Acute myeloid leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Infectious112.2%Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Other neoplastic/tumor-like112.2%Langerhans cell histiocytosis
Figure 2 Etiologic distribution of adult isolated lesser trochanter fracture cases Patient-level case counts are based on extracted original/new cases only (N = 46).
Figure 2 Etiologic distribution of adult isolated lesser trochanter fracture cases Patient-level case counts are based on extracted original/new cases only (N = 46).

Diagnostic Workup and Management

Table 6 summarizes diagnostic workup and treatment. Atraumatic, nontraumatic, or no significant trauma was explicitly documented in 27 of 46 cases (58.7%). Among the 36 malignant cases, malignancy was first recognized after the LT fracture in 25 cases (25/36, 69.4%; also 25/46, 54.3% of all included cases), was known before the fracture in eight cases (8/36, 22.2%; 8/46, 17.4% overall), and was unclear or not reported in three cases (3/36, 8.3%; 3/46, 6.5% overall). Radiographs were documented in 41 of 46 cases (89.1%), CT in 30 cases (65.2%), MRI in 23 cases (50.0%), bone scan/scintigraphy in 12 cases (26.1%), and PET or PET-CT in 5 cases (10.9%). LT/proximal femoral lesion tissue diagnosis or pathology confirmation was documented in 18 cases (39.1%); this category required biopsy, operative pathology, or pathologic confirmation of the fracture-associated LT/proximal femoral lesion and did not include prior malignancy history alone. These percentages describe what was reported in the published cases and do not measure diagnostic accuracy, comparative effectiveness, or recommended utilization.

Table 6
Diagnostic workup, management, and reporting summary Counts reflect patient-level documentation in the extracted data fields. NR or unavailable details were not assumed to be negative. The tissue diagnosis/pathology variable refers to biopsy, operative specimen pathology, or other pathologic confirmation of the fracture-associated LT/proximal femoral lesion; it does not count a prior cancer diagnosis or remote biopsy of a primary tumor alone. The three malignancy-timing categories are mutually exclusive and account for all 36 malignant cases. Imaging, treatment, and follow-up percentages are reporting frequencies in published cases and should not be interpreted as measures of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, comparative effectiveness, or recommended use. LT: Lesser trochanter; NR: Not reported.

VariablesPatient cases with documented feature (n)% of patient casesDenominator
Atraumatic/nontraumatic or no significant trauma documented2758.7%46
Known malignancy before LT fracture documented822.2% (17.4% overall)36 malignant cases (46 overall)
Malignancy first recognized after LT fracture2569.4% (54.3% overall)36 malignant cases (46 overall)
Timing of malignancy unclear or not reported38.3% (6.5% overall)36 malignant cases (46 overall)
Radiographs/X-ray documented4189.1%46
CT documented3065.2%46
MRI documented2350.0%46
Bone scan/scintigraphy documented1226.1%46
PET/PET-CT documented510.9%46
Fracture-associated LT/proximal femoral tissue diagnosis/pathology documented1839.1%46
Orthopedic surgery/fixation/reconstruction documented2758.7%46
Radiation therapy documented1226.1%46
Systemic disease therapy documented1430.4%46
Outcome/follow-up reported2758.7%46

Orthopedic surgery, fixation, or reconstruction of the LT/proximal femoral condition was documented in 27 cases (58.7%). Reported surgical strategies included prophylactic intramedullary nailing, sliding hip screw or dynamic hip screw fixation, tumor prosthesis, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, custom proximal femoral endoprosthesis, en bloc resection, and allograft-prosthesis reconstruction [ 1 , 3 , 10 , 13 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 25 ]. The Papineni LT fracture was treated conservatively; surgery addressed the concomitant olecranon injury rather than the proximal femur [ 28 ]. Radiation therapy was documented in 12 cases (26.1%), systemic disease therapy in 14 cases (30.4%), and outcome or follow-up in 27 cases (58.7%).

Discussion

Malignancy dominated the reported adult LT fracture literature. In the extracted dataset, malignant etiologies accounted for 36 of 46 published cases (78.3%), including 27 metastatic solid tumors. This value is a reporting frequency within a selected case-report and case-series evidence base, not an estimate of the prevalence of malignancy among unselected adults with LT fracture. Publication and selection bias likely favor unusual, severe, and malignant presentations, while uncomplicated benign cases may be underreported. The pattern is nevertheless consistent with earlier radiology reports describing atraumatic LT avulsion as a potential sign of proximal femoral tumor infiltration and supports a low threshold for further evaluation when the mechanism is atraumatic, low energy, unclear, or the radiographic appearance is suspicious [ 14 , 20 , 26 , 29 ].

The design-specific JBI appraisal directly informed interpretation of the synthesis. Case reports generally described the presenting condition and diagnostic workup, but adverse events and longitudinal outcomes were frequently absent. In the case series, consecutive and complete inclusion of eligible cases was often unclear, and outcome reporting was inconsistent. These limitations increase selection and reporting bias and reduce representativeness; therefore, the findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating rather than estimates of prevalence, diagnostic performance, or treatment superiority.

The differential should not stop at malignancy. Benign, infectious, and metabolic diagnoses were also found. Bonshahi et al. described elderly patients with isolated LT fractures in whom occult intertrochanteric instability or osteoporotic injury was clinically relevant [ 18 ]. Singh et al. reported a nonpathologic adult LT fracture after trauma [ 19 ], and Miyake et al. described an adult stress avulsion related to repetitive baseball pitching [ 4 ]. Sharma et al. reported tuberculosis as an infectious mimic, while McCambridge et al. reported Langerhans cell histiocytosis in an 18-year-old [ 10 , 16 ]. Papineni et al. added renal osteodystrophy with secondary hyperparathyroidism in a young adult with end-stage renal disease, expanding the benign/nonpathologic spectrum beyond trauma and osteoporosis [ 28 ]. The concurrent olecranon fractures in that report did not alter the anatomical classification of the radiographically isolated LT fracture.

Radiographs are an appropriate starting point, but they are not enough when the presentation is atraumatic, low energy, or clinically discordant. An X-ray may show the fracture while missing marrow replacement, soft-tissue extension, skip lesions, or systemic disease burden. James and Davies highlighted this problem in the setting of initial anteroposterior hip imaging, where tumor infiltration may be subtle and additional projections or MRI can reveal destructive disease [ 29 ]. In the present review, CT and MRI were frequently used, and tissue diagnosis/pathology of the fracture-associated LT/proximal femoral lesion was documented in 18 cases (39.1%). MRI helps define local marrow and soft-tissue involvement, while CT, bone scan, and PET/CT can support staging or primary-tumor search. When neoplasm or infection remains in the differential, tissue diagnosis is especially important before definitive oncologic reconstruction.

Management often moves beyond routine fracture care. An isolated LT fragment may be the visible part of a larger proximal femoral lesion that can progress to subtrochanteric or intertrochanteric fracture. Several reports used prophylactic fixation or reconstruction to prevent catastrophic fracture and permit mobilization [ 1 , 3 , 13 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 25 ]. Treatment still has to be individualized based on lesion size, expected survival, systemic disease status, tumor histology, functional goals, and patient preference. Benign stress, traumatic, or metabolic cases may recover with conservative treatment and management of the underlying disorder, whereas malignant cases often require orthopedic stabilization, radiation, systemic therapy, or a combination of these approaches.

Suggested Diagnostic Approach

The following is an expert-informed approach based on the included reports and musculoskeletal-oncology guidance; it has not been formally validated by the included studies as a diagnostic pathway. In adults with an atraumatic, low-energy, unclear-mechanism, or radiographically suspicious isolated LT fracture, MRI of the pelvis/proximal femur may be considered after initial radiographs to define marrow and soft-tissue involvement. CT can further characterize cortical destruction and assist procedural planning. When imaging raises concern for destructive disease, infection, or systemic malignancy, staging studies and selected laboratory testing should be individualized rather than applied as a fixed panel [ 29 , 33 ]. Referral to orthopedic oncology should occur before biopsy, prophylactic fixation, or definitive tumor surgery whenever a primary bone tumor or indeterminate destructive lesion remains possible. Biopsy should be coordinated with the orthopedic oncologist, musculoskeletal radiologist, and pathologist so that the tract can be incorporated into any subsequent resection and that contamination of uninvolved compartments is minimized [ 34 ]. Clearly traumatic or metabolic cases with reassuring imaging may be managed according to fracture stability, the underlying bone disorder, and patient factors, while malignancy and infection remain in the differential until reasonably excluded.

Limitations

The limitations mainly reflect the source literature. Most reports were case reports or small case series, making the evidence highly susceptible to publication and selection bias; the data cannot establish the true incidence of LT fracture or the prevalence of malignancy in an unselected adult population. Diagnostic workup, follow-up duration, and outcome reporting varied across reports, and the JBI appraisal identified recurrent limitations in longitudinal outcome reporting and in the consecutive or complete inclusion of case-series patients. Several older articles contained limited patient-level detail, and some newer articles included literature-review summaries without uniform data fields. Counts therefore represent explicit documentation in published reports rather than population-level rates, diagnostic accuracy, or comparative effectiveness. The English-language restriction, adopted because reliable translation resources were unavailable, may have introduced language bias and led to missed cases. The review protocol was not prospectively registered, which is an additional limitation, although the eligibility criteria, extraction fields, etiologic categories, and synthesis plan were defined before extraction. Full-text availability and indexing limitations may also have led to missed reports. One additional report was identified during peer review and included, which improved completeness but also illustrates the possibility of residual missed literature. Finally, only original or clearly new cases were extracted from review-style publications to reduce double-counting, so the patient count may differ from prior narrative summaries.

Conclusions

An isolated LT fracture in an adult should raise concern for underlying pathology, particularly when the mechanism is atraumatic, low energy, unclear, or discordant with the imaging findings. In this systematic review of 28 studies and 46 published patient cases, 36 cases had malignant etiologies. Among those malignant cases, malignancy was first recognized after the fracture in 25 cases (25/36, 69.4%), was known beforehand in eight cases (8/36, 22.2%), and was unclear or not reported in three cases (3/36, 8.3%). These frequencies reflect a selected case-report and case-series literature and do not estimate the prevalence of malignancy among unselected adults. Primary malignant bone tumors, hematologic malignancy, infection, and benign/nonpathologic causes, including renal osteodystrophy, were also identified. Atraumatic, low-energy, or radiographically suspicious cases warrant advanced imaging and coordinated orthopedic-oncology evaluation, with carefully planned biopsy when indicated; clearly metabolic or traumatic cases should be managed according to the underlying disorder and fracture stability. Early recognition may prevent delayed cancer diagnosis, avoid poorly planned biopsy or fixation, guide stabilization decisions, and improve multidisciplinary coordination.

The authors thank the Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine Library for assistance in accessing essential articles for this systematic review. Artificial intelligence tools (e.g., ChatGPT) were used for language editing, formatting, and organizational support. The authors independently verified all extracted data, citations, analyses, interpretations, and conclusions.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design: Ethan J. Sack, Max Deneroff

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ethan J. Sack, Zubair Mohammed, Austin Khau, Chadi Ellaham, Jared W. Nichols, Max Deneroff

Drafting of the manuscript: Ethan J. Sack, Max Deneroff

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ethan J. Sack, Zubair Mohammed, Austin Khau, Chadi Ellaham, Jared W. Nichols, Max Deneroff

Supervision: Jared W. Nichols

References

1 Isolated avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter in adults In Vivo Cho HS Lee YK Yoon BH Park JW Ha YC Koo KH 3519 3526 34 2020 33144462 10.21873/invivo.12193 PMC7811641

2 Fracture of the lesser trochanter as a sign of undiagnosed tumor disease in adults Eur J Med Res Herren C Weber CD Pishnamaz M Dienstknecht T Kobbe P Hildebrand F Pape HC 72 20 2015 26336955 10.1186/s40001-015-0167-8 PMC4559168

3 Avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter as a result of a preliminary malignant tumor of bone. A report of four cases J Bone Joint Surg Am Afra R Boardman DL Kabo JM Eckardt JJ 1299 1304 81 1999 10505526 10.2106/00004623-199909000-00011

4 An avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter of the femur with prodromal symptoms in an adult: a case report and review of literature J Orthop Case Rep Miyake Y Mitani S Namba Y Kikuoka R 1 4 12 2022 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i08.2940 PMC9831232 36687492

5 Adductor canal syndrome after lesser trochanter avulsion fracture in a 19-year-old J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Agrawal N Eslami MH Abou Ali AN Reitz KM Sridharan N 101098 9 2023 37101660 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101098 PMC10123372

6 Bone metastasis manifested 52 years after resection of an apparently benign paraganglioma: a case report SAGE Open Med Case Rep Yu R Auerbach MS Honda NS 2050313 12 2024 10.1177/2050313X241229853 PMC10851755 38333518

7 Preliminary presentation of metastatic non-small cell carcinoma of the lung as atraumatic avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter Case Rep Oncol Creissen A Rajeev A Jain K Banaszkiewicz P 436 441 13 2020 32399013 10.1159/000506451 PMC7204840

8 Isolated spontaneous atraumatic avulsion of lesser trochanter of femur-a pathognomonic sign of malignancy in adults? A case report and review of literature J Orthop Case Rep Kumar P Agarwal S Rajnish RK Kumar V Jindal K 16 19 7 2017 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.930 PMC5868875 29600203

9 Case report: a case of femoral metastatic cancer misdiagnosed as isolated femoral lesser trochanter avulsion fracture Front Oncol Pang MQ Wu FZ Chen JY Zhu RT Jin G Gong WJ Jiang HT 1565771 15 2025 40599861 10.3389/fonc.2025.1565771 PMC12209255

10 Tuberculosis challenging pathognomicity of atraumatic avulsion of the lesser trochanter for malignancy: a rare case report JBJS Case Connect Sharma A Kamboj K Kumar R Sud A 0 12 2022 10.2106/JBJS.CC.21.00782 35852168

11 Ewing's sarcoma mimicking an avulsion fracture J Belg Soc Radiol Vanhoenacker C Myncke J Vanhoenacker F 78 105 2021 34901739 10.5334/jbsr.2618 PMC8622154

12 Stage IV primary bronchogenic carcinoma presenting as a lesser trochanteric avulsion fracture Curr Orthop Pract Uddin F Tayara B Al-Khateeb H 336 338 27 2016

13 Isolated lesser trochanter fracture in adults: an early indicator of tumor infiltration Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Rouvillain JL Jawahdou R Blanco OL Benchikh-El-Fegoun A Enkaoua E Uzel M 217 220 97 2011 21354885 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.005

14 Non-traumatic lesser trochanter avulsion: a report of three cases Iowa Orthop J Khoury JG Brandser EA Found EM Jr Buckwalter JA 150 154 18 1998 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2378165/ 9807723 PMC2378165

15 Lesser trochanter fracture: the presenting feature of a more sinister pathology BMJ Case Rep Fox TP Lakkol S Oliver G 0 2014 2014 10.1136/bcr-2013-202590 PMC4054471 24895388

16 Langerhans cell histiocytosis presenting as a lesser trochanter fracture in an adolescent: a case report JBJS Case Connect McCambridge TM Papakyrikos C Levin A 0 13 2023 10.2106/JBJS.CC.21.00820 36821120

17 Quiz case. Nontraumatic avulsion of the lesser trochanter secondary to metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon Eur J Radiol Edmonds LD Ly JQ Carter MC Lusk JD 57 59 47 2003 12810224 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00040-8

18 Isolated lesser trochanter fractures in elderly--a case for prophylactic DHS fixation. A case series Injury Bonshahi AY Knowles D Hodgson SP 196 198 35 2004 14736480 10.1016/s0020-1383(03)00213-4

19 Nonpathological lesser trochanter fracture in adult: case report and brief review of literature J Clin Diagn Res Singh P Kumar A Shekhawat V Singh P 0 5 9 2015 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15760.6834 PMC4668491 26673017

20 Isolated fracture of the lesser trochanter in adults: an initial manifestation of metastatic malignant disease J Bone Joint Surg Am Bertin KC Horstman J Coleman SS 770 773 66 1984 https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/abstract/1984/66050/isolated_fracture_of_the_lesser_trochanter_in.18.aspx 6725326

21 Isolated lesser trochanter fracture associated with leukemia Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) Heiney JP Leeson MC 0 8 38 2009 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19377651/ 19377651

22 Isolated fracture of the lesser trochanter as a first manifestation of metastatic lung carcinoma J Med Cases Reategui-Villegas D Carrasco PC Dijeres AZ Betancourt JB 259 261 4 2013

23 Isolated fracture of the lesser trochanter—an indicator of malignancy at proximal femoral head: a case report Orthop Rheumatol Phan TQ Vu TT 30 32 10 2018

24 Trochanter minor avulsion fracture in an old patient: greater care in the diagnosis of hip pain in the elderly J Emerg Med Case Rep Uzun E Çıraklı A Günay AE Mutlu M 77 79 7 2016

25 A non-traumatic avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter: other diagnosis not to be missed Praxis (Bern 1994) Koçer S Grácio S Molnar P Baumgartner L 105 107 110 2021 33530775 10.1024/1661-8157/a003614

26 Nontraumatic avulsion of the lesser trochanter: a pathognomonic sign of metastatic disease? Skeletal Radiol Phillips CD Pope TL Jr Jones JE Keats TE MacMillan RH 3rd 106 110 17 1988 3363377 10.1007/BF00365136

27 Cough induced avulsion of the lesser trochanter Nebr Med J Gradwohl JR Mailliard JA 280 281 72 1987 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3658031/ 3658031

28 Bilateral olecranon and left lesser trochanter avulsion fractures in renal osteodystrophy: a rare case report and comprehensive review Acta Med Litu Papineni VR Botchu R Iyengar KP Chapala S Shah AR Rathinavelu B 313 321 32 2025 41659143 10.15388/Amed.2025.32.2.1 PMC12875559

29 Atraumatic avulsion of the lesser trochanter as an indicator of tumour infiltration Eur Radiol James SL Davies AM 512 514 16 2006 15702334 10.1007/s00330-005-2675-3

30 The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM 0 372 2021 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 PMC8008539 33781348

31 PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis Campbell Syst Rev Haddaway NR Page MJ Pritchard CC McGuinness LA 0 18 2022 10.1002/cl2.1230 PMC8958186 36911350

32 Systematic reviews of etiology and risk JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis Moola S Munn Z Tufanaru C Adelaide, Australia JBI 2024

33 Use of imaging prior to referral to a musculoskeletal oncologist J Am Acad Orthop Surg Miller BJ 0 8 27 2019 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00109 31206439

34 Biopsy and the diagnostic evaluation of musculoskeletal tumours: critical but often missed in the 21st century ANZ J Surg Trieu J Sinnathamby M Di Bella C 133 138 86 2016 26235443 10.1111/ans.13251

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты