DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.109105
Management of Clostridioides difficile infections in patients with hematological malignancies - a survey by European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) and Infectious Diseases Working Party (IDWP) of The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) are particularly at risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The 10th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-10) group developed recommendations for managing CDI in patients with HM, preceded by a survey to document current CDI practices.
METHODS
ECIL members completed an online expert survey on epidemiology, severity criteria, and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to CDI. Rates were reported using the number of responses as the denominator.
RESULTS
Overall, 49 experts from different centers responded, including both hematologists and infectious disease specialists. The rate of CDI in adults with HM was 5-10% in 46% of centers and in children in 36% of centers. We identified important limitations in CDI severity definitions, with leukocytosis and hypoalbuminemia being the least useful criteria. Therapeutic choices in patients with HM were predominantly vancomycin, with fidaxomicin used less frequently. Metronidazole monotherapy was used despite data showing lower efficacy. For recurrent CDI, fidaxomicin was the preferred drug. For ≥2nd recurrence, 31% of centers used fecal microbiota transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS
The survey identified discrepancies in current practice and highlighted several unmet needs, including better-defined severity criteria, optimization of the use and duration of available agents, and access to intravenous agents for patients unable to take oral therapy.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.