MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000005252

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2025

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.

Daher Mohammad, Aoun Marven, Cottrill Ethan J, Wang Zhi, Hurley Richard K, Lavelle William F, Passias Peter G, Diebo Bassel G, Daniels Alan H, Sebaaly Amer

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool the available data comparing MIS to open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures and provide a more comprehensive assessment of this topic.

BACKGROUND

There remains a debate over whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open fixation provides superior outcomes for patients with thoracolumbar fractures. While several randomized controlled trials and prospective studies have compared these two approaches, the published studies are limited by sample size.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases was performed on October 1, 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications, surgery-related parameters, early and late postoperative back pain, and postoperative regional kyphosis.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and five prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 584 patients, with 299 in the MIS group and 285 in the open group. MIS patients were shown to have less EBL (MD=-155.86; 95% CI: -217.97 to -93.76, P <0.001), a shorter LOS (MD=-3.34; 95% CI: -4.62 to -2.06, P <0.001), lower pain scores during the early postoperative period (MD=-1.14; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.71, P <0.001), and less regional kyphosis (MD=-5.17; 95% CI: -7.17 to -3.16, P <0.001), even when stratifying by study type. In addition, fluoroscopy time was longer in the MIS group (MD=0.60; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, P =0.003), although this difference was not seen when looking at RCTs only.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with thoracolumbar fractures, treatment with MIS was associated with decreased EBL, shorter LOS, earlier pain reduction, and less regional kyphosis compared with treatment with open fixation. In addition, higher radiation exposure was seen among patients treated with MIS. While MIS offers several potential benefits, both MIS and open fixation remain safe and reliable options for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Для цитирования: Daher Mohammad, Aoun Marven, Cottrill Ethan J, Wang Zhi, Hurley Richard K, Lavelle William F, Passias Peter G, Diebo Bassel G, Daniels Alan H, Sebaaly Amer. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.. Spine. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005252.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.