MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.452

Медицинская библиотека · Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology · 2013

[A case of polyarteritis nodosa with giant intracranial aneurysm].

Uemura Jyunichi, Inoue Takeshi, Aoki Junya, Saji Naoki, Shibazaki Kensaku, Kimura Kazumi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 46-year-old man with a history of the left retinal central artery obstruction and old cerebral infarction in the right middle cerebral artery region presented with right total blindness due to the right retinal central artery occlusion accompanied by a cherry red spot. He had been found to have a giant, 17 mm-in-diameter aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery and a right vertebral arterial aneurysm. The intra-arterial thrombolysis was performed with urokinase injection for the right eye artery origin, and the right eyesight has improved. Cranial and pelvic angiography showed multiple stenosis and dilatation of external carotid and internal iliac arteries. The right superficial temporal artery biopsy revealed the arteritis with fibrinoid necrosis. He was diagnosed as having polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) by clinical course, angiography, and the superficial temporal artery biopsy. Several studies have reported that PAN had less intracranial aneurysm and the diameter of the aneurysm was less than 5 mm. Our case is the first report that PAN had giant aneurysm of 17 mm, diagnosed by temporal artery biopsy. The temporal artery biopsy should be considered to diagnose PAN.

Для цитирования: Uemura Jyunichi, Inoue Takeshi, Aoki Junya, Saji Naoki, Shibazaki Kensaku, Kimura Kazumi. [A case of polyarteritis nodosa with giant intracranial aneurysm].. Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology. 2013. DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.452.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.